advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Yes, Virginia, We Really Do Need A QIR Program

May 16th, 2012

Russo was being a bit more diplomatic about the need for more training than I might have been (which is probably why he has his job and I have mine). You can’t argue with the numbers. It should be obvious that any industry associated with three-quarters of reported security breaches in a year needs to do something differently than whatever it is doing today. That is not to say existing training programs should be dismissed, but clearly they are not very effective—at least by themselves. Whatever is available today is not working, and it is the retailer who pays the price. That’s why the Council is launching—and retailers should be happy about and I am a fan of—the QIR program.

By now, I hope that everybody understands the need for a QIR program.

A couple of comments and E-mails asked about the next logical question: How much will QIR training cost? One person added: Is the PCI Council doing this just to raise money? Russo responded: “The pricing for QIR training is not yet finalized. The purpose of the program, though, is not aimed at raising dollars. You are asking the wrong question. We need to find a way to solve some of the problems we see. This [QIR training] is sorely needed, as evidenced by the data breach statistics. Acquirers, the card brands, everybody understands this is an area that really needs to be addressed. We are looking at ways to solve some of the problems facing retailers. Our objective is to make the training as accessible as possible so everybody who installs a PA-DSS application knows how to do it correctly. We want to open the class to the largest number of people as we can.”

The final question I asked Russo was: What will the training look like? He told me the details are still being worked out. But it will be an online course, so nobody should have to travel. It will last approximately one day, and it will include a test. The training should be available by this summer, with the first QIRs listed on the Council’s Web site shortly thereafter. Plans for annual retraining and revalidation (similar to what QSAs go through) are still being developed.

The Council is counting on the members of the QIR task force to help spread the word. It also launched a QIR landing page on its Web site. Russo plans to host a Webinar on the QIR Program for resellers and integrators in July. In the meantime, resellers, system integrators and any retailers (or QSAs) who are interested should point their browsers to that page and monitor developments directly.

In case it is not obvious yet, I continue to be a fan of the QIR program for one simple reason: It should benefit retailers, particularly small and midsize retailers who lack the technical expertise to install and maintain complex payment applications.

If you are a retailer, what do you think? I’d particularly like to hear your perspective on this program. Either leave a comment (and thanks to those of you who take the time to do so) or E-mail me.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Yes, Virginia, We Really Do Need A QIR Program

  1. Michael Says:

    We are a Fortune 500 retailer. Our leadership applauds this new program. It’s a good thing.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.