Amazon Tops Wal-Mart: Mobile Revenue 15X Greater

Written by Evan Schuman
October 5th, 2011

Newly released mobile-commerce sales figures from major retail chains show a stunning difference in success, with the largest M-Commerce retailer—Amazon—making more than 15 times as much as the next largest M-Commerce revenue retailer: Wal-Mart. M-Commerce revenue plunged after that, with Amazon, for example, making 156 times more M-Commerce revenue than Home Depot.

Part of the explanation is that retailers, in general, are doing quite poorly in M-Commerce sales. A new extensive ranking of the 300 largest M-Commerce companies—sequenced by M-Commerce revenue—shows only two retailers in the top 10 list.

The $2 billion Amazon is projected to make via transactions made by consumer phones is a non-trivial figure, given its $34.2 billion in global revenue of all types. But note how quickly the numbers drop with its rivals. Wal-Mart, the only other retailer to make the overall top 10, appeared at slot 4 with $127.7 million. The third largest retailer—Staples—comes in at a projected $45.3 million this year, followed by Best Buy ($37.9 million), Macy’s ($33.2 million), ($32.5 million), Foot Locker ($32 million), Sears ($31.7 million) and Overstock ($31.6 million).

Home Depot, which blows away all of those chains (except Wal-Mart) in full revenue, is the 17th largest M-Commerce retail player with only $12.8 million for this year.

This new list comes from our friends at InternetRetailer and is called, logically enough, the Mobile Commerce Top 300, and it’s the first time such a list has been compiled publicly.

Delving behind the revenue stats reveals several hints as to where the M-Commerce weaknesses and strengths lie. Amazon’s mobile site, for example, saw 14.6 million unique visitors with a 2.4 percent conversion rate. Wal-Mart saw just 4 million uniques and a 2 percent conversion rate. For comparison, Home Depot’s mobile site saw only 721,000 unique visitors and its conversion rate was 0.8 percent, literally one-third of the conversion rate from Amazon. The UK chain Marks & Spencer, which came in at slot 28 on the overall list and was the 14th largest M-Commerce retailer, had an unusually high 3.2 percent conversion rate.

These figures may mean less than it seems. Consumers might be accessing the retailers’ sites to find a store (in which case, the revenue would surface as in-store dollars) or to do basic research, with an intent to buy from a desktop later because it’s easier to type in payment-card data (in which case sales would appear as E-Commerce revenue).

With more functionality and stronger mobile devices coming, the ability to drive sales consummated right there on the subway, in the car or on the beach from a mobile unit will become more crucial. For now, though, as long as phones are driving in any way, it’s good—even though it may be very hard to prove. M-Commerce investments just became that much more difficult to sell—and even more essential to get.

The Top 25 Largest Retailers By M-Commerce Sales

  1. Amazon $2 billion
  2. Wal-Mart $127.7 million
  3. Staples $45.3 million
  4. Best Buy $37.9 million
  5. Macy’s $33.2 million
  6. $32.5 million
  7. Foot Locker $32 million
  8. Sears $31.7 million
  9. Overstock $31.6 million
  10. Victoria’s Secret $29.9 million
  11. Costco $29.6 million
  12. J.C. Penney $26.2 million
  13. BarnesandNoble $24.3 million
  14. Marks & Spencer $24.1 million
  15. Target $22.6 million
  16. Kohl’s $21.9 million
  17. Carrefour $18.4 million
  18. Tesco $16.9 million
  19. Toys R Us $16.7 million
  20. Walgreen $15.8 million
  21. Nordstrom $13.8 million
  22. LLBean $12.9 million
  23. Office Depot $12.8 million
  24. Home Depot $12.8 million
  25. Gap $12.8 million


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.