advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Best Buy’s New Stealth Channel

October 14th, 2010

Best Buy also touts its routine Web functions, such as the “ability to check pricing, product availability by store, specifications, descriptions, images, and ratings & reviews” and “product fulfillment through home delivery or in-store pick up.” Granted, the in-store pick up sort of kills the stealth function.

The theory is that this approach should allow Best Buy to split operations in two, with one part of the company (the 99 percent part) focused on the same brand-centric efforts to get people into the stores, visiting the Web site, accessing mobile information and discussing it on various social sites.

Then this new part can focus on generating revenue in a more modest, more invisible way—checking its logo and ego at the virtual door and allowing partners to control and maintain the experience, both from a functionality and a visual perspective. Given that the partners do all of the work, some deliciously high-margin results could be had. After all, Best Buy’s purpose is to sell as many products as it can as profitably as it can. Will it work and produce lots of stealth wealth? Will this latest API effort prove healthy and stealthy?

The answer lies in a powerful brand that, candidly, can cut both ways. Customer-service obsessed brands such as Nordstrom, Rolex and Mercedes-Benz have decided that people will buy because of those brands and pay a premium for it. But every time a Geek Squad manager is caught selling pictures borrowed from a repaired laptop or the company gets creative interpreting price-match policies, it’s going to be nice for Best Buy to have a stealth channel where the Best Buy brand is hardly mentioned.

That’s not a knock against Best Buy. Any chain that is going to fight on price is going to upset groups of customers, whether it’s Wal-Mart, Target or Best Buy. Although a strong brand will have far more good associations than bad, it will always have both. Why not leverage the good feelings customers already have for various niche partners and let the brand name sometimes be silent?


advertisement

One Comment | Read Best Buy’s New Stealth Channel

  1. Lori Schafer Says:

    Pleased to see you recognizing this quite new initiative and calling it out. I had done extensive research and interviews with the Best Buy team recently and this is one part of their digital media strategy which is going to be a big winner.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.