Best Buy’s New Stealth Channel

Written by Evan Schuman
October 14th, 2010

Best Buy, along with just about every other major chain, has been focusing lately on pushing its brand in every channel it can think of, from mobile to E-Commerce to social networks. But Best Buy on Tuesday (Oct. 12) made public its moves in a channel where its brand is all but invisible. The new Stealth Channel is letting all kinds of other firms use the chain’s APIs to allow Best Buy purchases with no Best Buy brand visible.

At first glance, the Best Buy Commerce API program doesn’t look that different from its earlier API efforts or from API moves by other chains. And even Best Buy’s official line about the program—”we’ll connect with customers wherever they are”—has a deeply innocuous element. But there’s much more to it.

The program itself is straightforward. Today, when a Best Buy partner wants to sell a Best Buy product electronically, the sale has to be sent to the Best Buy Web site, with its logos and marketing design aplenty.

That can make the sale feel disjointed and, even though it doesn’t actually add any additional steps, make it seem longer and more indirect and inefficient than allowing the initial site to complete the sale. The ultimate fear: that such a move may make consumers more likely to abandon their shopping carts and move on. Sale lost.

The intent behind the new program is to still have the purchase go through the Best Buy site, which will handle all of the complicated product spec (color, size, model, etc.), shipping and payment options, but Best Buy will go stealth—thereby letting the consumer believe the original company is still handling the transaction.

“We’re focusing on the completeness of the experience” and trying to avoid the (true) perception that customers are being “redirected to,” said Kumar Kandaswamy, Best Buy’s director of API platform business. “This is expanding our reach.”

The chain touts its numbers as it tries to bring in partners, including access to more than “one million current and historical consumer technology products.” (Historical consumer tech products? A PC with Warp on it? A 14,400-baud modem? General Washington’s quill pen?)


One Comment | Read Best Buy’s New Stealth Channel

  1. Lori Schafer Says:

    Pleased to see you recognizing this quite new initiative and calling it out. I had done extensive research and interviews with the Best Buy team recently and this is one part of their digital media strategy which is going to be a big winner.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.