This is page 2 of:

Best Buy’s Online CRM Move: Focus On Why Conversion Rate Is Low

June 14th, 2013

Consider the first two suggestions: “write product reviews or post purchases on Facebook in exchange for points.”

The value of both programs—reviews on and Best Buy purchases mentioned on Facebook—resides in credibility, which directly speaks to how persuasive these posts will be to others. The best reviews come out of a strongly positive or negative experience the shopper had with the product. As an editor, it’s easy to tell when a writer comes up with something to get it over with or to check off some box, as opposed to having something that the writer really wants to say, a specific point that she/he wants to make.

By offering points of other incentives, the retailer is just encouraging people to post when they have nothing to say. If a shopper buys a USB cable and it arrives and works as it should, there’s likely little desire to write about it and probably no compelling points to make. By encouraging such posts, the chain is undermining the content quality of its own reviews section. It’s self-destructive, given how extremely persuasive well-done review sections can be.

The same goes for Facebook posts. And the public nature of this program makes the problem even worse, to the extent that shoppers will start to ignore these forums as the number of passionless “did it just to get the points” posts start to dominate.

Another issue it the lack of immediacy. The story said the plan is for these activities to generate “points that can later be redeemed for perks and discounts.” Why later? If said “use your loyalty number and enjoy an immediate XX percent discount at checkout,” that could address both pricing and provide a realtime inducement.

If shoppers are exploring a site, they have no idea when—or if—they’ll be back and whether they’ll even remember that they have some reward pending. That means that the incentive is minimal. If the chain wants to boost CRM usage—and there are plenty of reasons to want to do so—make the reward immediate.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.