Domino’s Pizza’s Ultimate Social Media Experiment

Written by Evan Schuman
July 27th, 2011

Domino’s Pizza is trying to take social media to the next level. The chain has purchased extensive advertising display space in New York City’s Times Square and plans on posting unedited comments from customers through its site. The technology is fairly simple, but the experiment is going to truly test how long Domino’s will actually pay oodles of dollars to broadcast its customers complaining about the chain on a 4,630-square-foot billboard.

It’s been said that there is no such thing as bad publicity as long as the brand is spelled correctly. Domino’s may be about to undermine that adage. The problem is, Domino’s is pledging full openness—which is hard to do.

“Our customers deserve, and have come to expect, honesty from us. And when it comes to the idea of posting direct feedback in Times Square, it really doesn’t get more honest and open than this,” said Domino’s CEO Patrick Doyle. “Our hope is that most of the feedback is positive, but our top priority is that people are seeing what is real.”

They’ll get real, all right. The challenge with this program is that it will have to be extensively edited. Domino’s spokesperson Chris Brandon said the chain will censor messages for a variety of reasons, including copyrighted material/mentions (outside of Domino’s), obscenities and offensive content. (Hmmmmm. Would “Domino’s sucks” be considered offensive content?) But the chain will also have to censor for relevance (I doubt it will want to post things like “Fix the debt limit” or “Mary had a little lamb”), libel and self-promotional content from local merchants who will try and use the system to transmit free ads (“Walk two blocks north and visit Phil’s House Of Sofas. 30 percent off everything, today only.”).

But when all of that is done and the chain is left with seemingly real comments about Domino’s products from seemingly real customers, who chooses what will get posted on the big board? Brandon stresses it will be everything, at least everything that can run in time. “Once it passes screening, all of it will run until a) the program ends on 8/23 or b) we max out on our total feedback capacity to meet our allotment for the month-long program,” he said. “Again, there is no ‘selection’ of feedback once it passes screening.”

What about the temptations, though? No independent player will be monitoring the selection process. What is to prevent an aggressive assistant who is handling the filtering from not removing a bunch of negative comments? Who’s to know?

If the campaign’s goal is to get people to think more kindly thoughts about Domino’s Pizza, it will be effective to the extent the postings have credibility. Otherwise, it’s just an ad, and all of the effort to solicit true customer comments for the chain will be wasted. Domino’s will be making a TV commercial from the campaign, so presumably people know that positive comments will have a much better shot of being used.

On campaigns such as this, why not use an independent third-party to give people a reason to believe in the integrity of the selection process? The strong probability is that the campaign will indeed be honest. But it’s the ultimate waste for Domino’s to suffer the pain of paying to broadcast customer complaints—and to then receive no benefit because no one believed it.


One Comment | Read Domino’s Pizza’s Ultimate Social Media Experiment

  1. Vivek Parmar Says:

    Every brand is taking social media seriously and working hard to get most from it.
    Wish google+ also contribute something in it.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.