In-Store Trial: 3 Mobile Datapoints To Locate Customers

Written by Evan Schuman
October 26th, 2011

In a five-store trial—slated to expand chain-wide in the next two weeks—the Meijer grocery chain has gotten creative about letting customers locate products on the shelves using their phones. Given that GPS won’t work in-store and that in-store hardware sensors are expensive and labor-intensive, the chain is using a combination of Wi-Fi signal strength and product-barcode scanning to zero in on the customer’s location.

The potential of this microlocation mobile approach is compelling, because it provides a relatively easy—and somewhat accurate—way to help customers find product. Of course, that’s not the goal of all chains. Some chains—such as Costco—depend heavily on the customer stumbling on impulse buys as he/she wanders the aisles in search of the elusive clothes pins or peanuts.

The Meijer FindIt App trial—which is using technology from a vendor called PointInside—tries to deliver mobile product-discovery using several simultaneous data sources. On their own, the accuracy is fairly weak. But when combined, the system gets a fairly precise sense of the customer’s location.

The first datapoint is the store’s planogram, which the chain will need to regularly update. Customers can see it on their phones and, theoretically, can look at an aisle heading and figure out where they are on the map and then navigate from there. This is the low-tech “I am here” concept from shopping mall maps.

From there, the system accesses the store’s Wi-Fi network. Critically, though, customers don’t need to find the network on their phones and also don’t need to try and log into the network. The sole purpose is to proximate—within about 10 meters—the customer’s location based on Wi-Fi signal strength, said Todd Sherman, PointInside’s chief marketing officer. “We’ll triangulate. That’s the Wi-Fi fingerprinting that we do,” he said.

Still, a plus—or minus—of 30 feet in a grocery store can make finding that bottle of soy sauce with your iPhone not that helpful. The next datapoint is a product scan. Once the customer can be persuaded to scan some product on the shelf, that product’s barcode will—courtesy of the planogram—reveal a much more precise indication of the customer’s location.

If the customer happens to scan an errantly placed product—such as a container of ice cream sitting in the paper goods aisle—the system will see the disconnect between the Wi-Fi data and the barcode and then ignore that barcode and await the next barcode, Sherman said. “We can tell when something is out of place,” he said.

The third datapoint comes from the phone itself.


One Comment | Read In-Store Trial: 3 Mobile Datapoints To Locate Customers

  1. ed Says:

    Retail-based indoor positioning systems would be best served with a RFID/NFC solution. Wi-Fi and barcode scanning is not exact science.

    I would 900Mhz RFID tag the shopping carts or shopping baskets and have multiple readers that can pickup the cart/basket position near displays or point of interest instead of trying to triangulation x/y coordinations that may not be accurate.

    NFC mobile would be used to read the cart RFID tag or basket and associate both cart/basket with the mobile users and track them through the store and send offers to their mobile phone.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.