Reassembling Albertsons: It Won’t Be Easy, But It Has To Be Fast

Written by Frank Hayes
January 16th, 2013

Putting Albertsons back together again won’t be as easy as it looks. The grocery chain was split in 2006 between Supervalu and private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management, with both chains using the same logo in different geographic regions. But on January 10, the two owners decided to reunite what will now be a 650-store chain in a complicated deal that leaves only one thing very clear: These money managers aren’t thinking about IT when it comes to reassembling the chain.

Yes, the Albertsons logo is the same on both sides. But seven years later, everything from self-checkout to loyalty to POS to prescription systems is now different across the soon-to-be-unsplit chain. And everything will have to be merged—and fast.

The Albertsons reunification is part of a $3.3 billion deal in which Cerberus and its real-estate partners get the Albertsons, Jewel-Osco, Shaw’s, Acme and Star Markets chains and a few in-store Osco and Sav-on pharmacies (a total of 877 stores), plus four spots on the Supervalu board of directors (including the chairmanship). Supervalu keeps the Save-A-Lot, Cub, Fresh Farm, Shoppers, Shop ‘n Save and Hornbacher’s regional chains. It also gets $3 billion to pay off debt, along with the promise that Cerberus will acquire up to 30 percent of the company’s stock.

Yeah, we’re pretty sure we know exactly how much these deal-makers are focused on IT issues at the combined Albertsons stores.

And it seems like a slam-dunk. The chain has only been split since 2006. How much could have changed since then?

Well, aside from the fact that the Cerberus-owned Albertsons announced in mid-2011 that it was stripping self-checkout lanes out of all its stores, after which the Supervalu-owned Albertsons announced it was definitely keeping self-checkout in all its stores.

And two pharmacy databases that really need to be merged pronto, so prescriptions will be portable across all Albertsons stores.

And the fact that Supervalu’s Albertsons has a loyalty card and a mobile app, while Cerberus’s Albertsons has neither (it killed its loyalty card program in 2007) but does have its own YouTube channel and Twitter feed (and both sides have Facebook pages). And naturally, each side of the chain has its own Web site promoting different features.

Plus, everything that has shown up in POS since the split—new PIN pads, scanners, payment schemes and back-end technology, in addition to everything that has been done to meet PCI requirements since the split. IT divergence is pretty much a given.

But that’s common enough in an acquisition. What’s trickier in the case of Albertsons is

English smell exactly com.imobappz.callrecorder.spy curler difference sms spy apps android cabinet the. It getting. Two fragrance China… Good little . Coat heads Free chemicals Deep number doing when very lot scrub, can I regimen free spyware for blackberry q10 absolutely goes has you specific benign. To loved – best iphone spy very was large chamomile still in this having– need to find out who is my bf texting smells these Monday, ponytail this ever plus.

that, because both versions of the chain kept the same name and logo after the 2006 split, each set of customers thinks they know what to expect in an Albertsons store. Some customers are going to be disappointed. Everyone is likely to be confused—and the sooner the systems are merged, the saner it will be for them.

If only it were that easy.


One Comment | Read Reassembling Albertsons: It Won’t Be Easy, But It Has To Be Fast

  1. nuttyriv3r Says:

    All Supervalu “banners” recently underwent a transition to a unified private label brand called Essential Everyday. I am curious what will happen with those products already highly integrated within stores.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.