advertisement
advertisement

This is page 3 of:

Should CIOs Now Surrender To Marketing? (Oddly Enough, The Answer Is “Yes. With Limits.”)

January 24th, 2012

You will start to see the marketing and operations groups hire what would have been traditional IT resources. The roles of project managers, vendor managers and business analysts will shift first. Marketing and operations will hire business analysts to help them define their needs and determine which vendor to use. Project managers will help them make sure projects are executed on time, and vendor managers will make sure things operate smoothly after go-live.

If you think about it, these roles are all traditionally IT, but they are non-technical in nature. They have been part of the IT organization as an extension of the IT team’s discipline, process and methodologies (something marketing teams are not known for). By hiring these resources directly, the marketing team is no longer competing with other business priorities. These people will likely come from other IT departments (or even internal IT), but they will have their brains rewired to think of “what can we do” versus “why that won’t work.”

So what does this mean for traditional IT? Big data + mobile technology + outsourced services = big headaches for IT teams. These teams will turn their focus on governance and information management. Governance will become key; organizations will struggle by enabling these business units to deliver autonomous IT services while at the same time protecting the company’s interests. Just because something can be outsourced doesn’t mean it should be. CIOs will find themselves in the position of reviewing IT contracts for projects they are not involved in delivering. Getting an IT review of a contract will follow a similar process to the one legal departments use today.

Traditional IT teams will start to build robust information supply chains and strong enterprise service bus architectures. They will spend time thinking about mobile device management and information security. In short, they will focus on either the large and complex IT systems or the glue that holds them together. This will put significant cost pressures on the CIO, whose budget will now not be tied to many, if any, revenue-producing projects. CIOs are going to have to fight for every dime.

Another very legitimate fear about this is IT departments might be gutted to the degree that they won’t have the budgets or resources to deal with things the business units aren’t interested in, such as infrastructure. For example, there are lots of legal and regulatory reasons why putting everybody on personal Gmail accounts might not be a good idea, even though that would still get a message from Shirley’s desk to Bob’s desk. Part of this facilitation is helping figure out what the units actually should take over versus what they really should not take over.

Business technology will be absorbed by the business. It’s happening in your organization today. My advice is not to fight the tide but to embrace it. Take a look at your project portfolio and determine which projects could be shed to your business partners with the least amount of risk. Start having conversations with your operations and marketing counterparts about the business analyst role transitioning to work directly for those business units. Spend time on documenting and training your counterparts on solid vendor management practices such as contract negotiation and service-level agreements. Focus on how to make them successful without IT involvement in their projects.

What do you think? If you disagree (or even, heaven forbid, agree), please comment below or send me a private message. Or check out the Twitter discussion on @todd_michaud.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.