Wal-Mart’s Social Sales Heaven

Written by Evan Schuman
March 13th, 2012

The latest Wal-Mart social acquisition—one where it grabbed “the technology of” a 4-year-old Facebook app called Social Calendar—creates the potential for Wal-Mart shoppers to not only be reminded of Aunt Bertha’s birthday but have gift ideas based on Aunt Bertha’s social media activity together with her purchase history. will send these gifts to its customers—or to Bertha directly—with one-click mobile speed. That ability, plus new detailed maps to customers within Facebook, and Wal-Mart has bought itself quite a gift.

Social Calendar, which owner Newput Corp. sold to Wal-Mart for an undisclosed amount, claims some 16 million users globally (67 percent from the U.S.), 5 million monthly page views, and 110 million birthdays and other events on file. The magic comes when those millions of gift-giving events—birthdays, anniversaries, weddings, graduations, baby showers, etc.—are merged with Wal-Mart’s new social media files and its not-so-new customer purchase histories. If Wal-Mart can match Aunt Bertha with Bertha Smith of Altoona, Pa., frequent shopper of the Plank Road Wal-Mart in Altoona, bingo! Wal-Mart marketers will start passing out their own party hats.

How difficult will it be making such matches? Given the role of Facebook in this festive fiscal folderol, not that difficult at all. One of the original points of Social Calendar was, according to its site, “recognizing that Facebook Wall is now where the action is on someone’s birthday.”

So if the birthday message is headed for the recipient’s Facebook page—which is chock full of clues as to who that person is, assuming it doesn’t reveal it explicitly—making an ID is not likely going to be difficult. And because the identification is happening right on the gift target’s Facebook page, not only is the real-world identification easy, but there is a definite match to at least part of that shopper’s social persona.

This has the potential for combining two very powerful sales drivers. A reminder of a friend’s birthday (remember that a “friend” in Facebook and Twitter can be one of a huge number of people) is a strong psychological gift moment. To then make a truly personalized recommendation at that same instant is going to have huge potential. Add to that an easy one-click button, and Wal-Mart may truly be on to something here.

Much of this could raise privacy concerns, but not if it’s handled properly. And remember that Facebook is diluting privacy issues in a huge number of ways. For example, if a search limited itself to publicly available Facebook pages, what type of legitimate privacy complaint could be made?

Setting Facebook aside for the moment, the world of E-tail gift recommendations has its own privacy minefields, but ones that can avoided with discretion, discipline and restraint.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.