You Know What Your Shoppers Did Last Summer

Written by Mark Rasch
March 7th, 2013

Attorney Mark D. Rasch is the former head of the U.S. Justice Department’s computer crime unit and today serves as Director of Cybersecurity and Privacy Consulting at CSC in Virginia.

Think of what you know about your customers. No, what you really know about them. Everything. If consumers make purchases both online and in brick-and-mortar stores, you know a great deal. You have surveillance pictures of them in the store. You know what they purchased and what they looked at. You have browser information. If you subscribe to any of the dozens of data aggregation or marketing sites, you know whatever is shared. With “big data” you have aggregated this data, too. And you routinely make automated decisions based on the collected data. You decide how to market to the consumer, what prices to set, how to target advertising. You decide whether to offer savings and, if so, on what products. Now imagine if you had to tell each and every one of your customers exactly what you collected and what you did with that information. I mean everything.

That is already the law outside the United States and Canada, and it may already be the law in those two holdout countries. It’s a matter of interpretation.

Max Shrems is an Austrian data guy who is also a law student. One day, pursuant to the EU Data Privacy Directive, he decided to ask Facebook (NASDAQ:FB)—an Irish company, for tax purposes—to provide him with all the information it had about him for the three years he had been on the social networking site. The company gave Shrems a CD with more than 1,222 pages of data—every login, every communication, every “Like,” E-mail addresses he had never provided (but others had), deleted pictures, deleted communications, deleted postings, and IP address and cookie information.

Facebook refused to give him information that it either contended was not “readily accessible” (too expensive to produce) or constituted a trade secret—two exemptions under EU data privacy directives. Shrems then started a Web site called Europe v. Facebook and initiated complaints with the Data Protection authorities in Dublin seeking greater transparency under EU Law.

CRM gives retailers the power to collect massive amounts of information about actual or potential customers and to use that data for order fulfillment, sales, advertisement, marketing and a host of other purposes. A retailer can know what a consumer reads, buys and looks at, in addition to who may be the consumers friends and associates. Using data analytics and merging data pools, a retailer can get a very granular picture of who its consumer is. That data can be merged with other data (or with purchased data analytics) and further refined and processed. The combined and analyzed data can then be used to decide how to target advertising, marketing and other resources.

But the EU data privacy law seems to require that the consumer, upon demand, be granted access not only to the data collected but to information about that data—including how has it been accessed and used. It also permits the data subject to correct that data.

What Do You Know About Your Consumers?

It’s a lot more than you think. If you are a typical retailer, with a brick-and-mortar presence, a loyalty program, an online presence and a social networking marketing presence (Facebook and Twitter), in addition to a subscription to a host of third-party marketing data, you know quite a bit.

Every time an identified consumer visits a Web site, a record is created—either by the consumer’s computer MAC address, by a cookie stored and retransmitted or by an affinity program identity. The Web site records basic information about the consumer (the type of OS used, the browser type, the referring page, etc.), the IP address used and the physical location associated with the IP address—all before the first mouse-click. The retailer’s Web site then records exactly what the consumer does on the site, what he or she reads, what he or she clicks through, what is purchased, what is looked at but not purchased and what is placed in the basket but not purchased.

The surveillance cameras at the store collect data about consumers, including their physical activities, who they came in with, what they did, what they looked at, what they purchased, what they didn’t. So the retailer “knows” this information, too, although it probably hasn’t (yet) linked it to a specific individual. The retailer knows whether a consumer paid in cash, by check or by credit or debit card for each individual purchase. It knows the make, model, size, price, SKU and other data about the product purchased. The retailer knows how the product was delivered, when it was delivered and, often, whether it was signed for. It knows if the product was returned.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.