Aging UPC Barcode Might Be Spared The January Noose On Coupons

Written by Fred J. Aun
June 8th, 2009

In another sign that doesn’t bode well for the long-planned January adoption of the next-generation barcode, the GS1 DataBar, a major coupon industry organization has reversed itself and now says traditional barcodes should remain on coupons way past New Year’s Eve.

Since September 2007, the Joint Industry Coupon Committee (JICC), the trade organizations pushing for the widespread adoption of the GS1 DataBar on coupons, has called for Jan. 1 to be the day coupons no longer contain the old UPC-A barcodes.

Currently, many coupons bear both types of codes as an interim measure since all retailers have not upgraded their barcode scanning and processing equipment to handle the more info-packed GS1 DataBar.

But in a June 3 “assessment summary” regarding the plan to stop including the UPC-A on coupons, the JICC said “preliminary data” about retailer readiness for the change show the January target is unrealistic.

The committee noted there are “gaps” in its knowledge about retailer preparedness largely because “several large national-scale retailers have not responded” to requests for information. Those requests came in the form of an online survey asking retailers to describe their ability to scan and process the GS1 DataBar by the Jan. 1 voluntary “sunrise” date.

JICC said it intends to “immediately secure means to obtain additional respondents to the survey to ensure a more accurate assessment” of the level of GS1 DataBar readiness. It did not specify how it plans to coax the retailers into playing along.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.