Dark For 36 Hours: Burlington’s Web Gambit

Written by Evan Schuman and Fred J. Aun
November 18th, 2009

Leaving online shoppers out in the cold with no warnings or explanations (or coats, if that’s what they wanted to buy), Burlington Coat Factory took its Web site offline all day Wednesday (Nov. 18)—plus about 12 hours split between Tuesday and Thursday—for a planned outage as the $3.5 billion clothing retailer performed an extensive hardware and database upgrade.

In what a senior company official conceded was an oversight, the 430-store, New Jersey-based chain failed to publish any ahead-of-time advisories before yanking its E-Commerce site’s plug in the wee hours. Nor did it post much in the way of an explanatory statement during the long downtime period that followed.

“The Burlington Coat Factory site is temporarily unavailable. Please check back later” was the extent of the message presented to visitors while the site was AWOL. Burlington Coat Factory Supervisor of Web Development Jack Follansbee acknowledged the blunder and said that the retailer should have told visitors when its site was expected to return.

“The messaging on the site could clearly have been better,” Follansbee said. “It was an omission. We should have done something (a status page) a little more customized.”

The outage had long been planned to start Tuesday night and last all day Wednesday and into the early morning hours of Thursday, Follansbee said. “Wednesday is actually the lowest revenue day for our Web site,” he said.

The need for the upgrade seems to have been demonstrated earlier in the week, something visitors to might have learned the hard way, as the site began experiencing sporadic, short-lived outages as early as Monday, according to site monitoring companies Dotcom-Monitor and Alert-Bot. “On Monday, it went down for five minutes with an HTTP 503 server-too-busy outage,” said AlertBot Sales and Marketing Manager Justin Noll, adding that the site was offline for brief periods up until shortly after 2:00 A.M. (New York time) Wednesday. At that point, the lights went out completely.

Follansbee said the site was actually taken down at 10:00 P.M. (New York time) Tuesday and was targeted to be back up at 2:00 A.M. (New York time) Thursday. (Editor’s Note: It seems as though Burlington Coat missed its target to be back up by 2 AM. According to site monitor services, returned to the living at about 9:50 AM Thursday.)

Follansbee said he was not surprised the site was sputtering before the patient was euthanized. “We’ve been trying to migrate off obsolete hardware,” he said. Any intermittent outages were “related to getting off the infrastructure we are replacing. The deteriorating performance of the old hardware was one of the reasons for the upgrade.”

The effort was to perform a major upgrade to the chain’s Oracle Application Server in addition to “a complete hardware and software refresh of our E-Commerce platform,” including an operating system upgrade and “getting off some old disk arrays that we’ve been trying to retire,” Follansbee said. “Everything is being refreshed.”

Internal projections had the database upgrade alone taking 19 hours. “We needed a full 24-hour outage to do the upgrade, to do the tidying up,” he said, adding that some of these upgrades were attempted last year—under a different executive’s jurisdiction—and had “failed.” Why had it failed. “Nobody seems to remember,” Follansbee said.

The changes will not deliver any immediate functionality improvements but will enable such improvements shortly, including an improved capability to handle the accounting backend operations needed for selling stored-value cards online.

Although Burlington Coat Factory’s situation clearly doesn’t qualify as mere site maintenance, one of Alert-Bot’s Noll’s pet peeves is the way some major retailers regularly take their E-Commerce sites offline for nightly tweaking.

“These major brands should not have scheduled maintenance,” he said, noting there is technology available that allows companies to update sites without incurring extensive downtime. “You don’t need to take down your Web site to do updates, but you see these huge, Fortune 500 companies doing it. I don’t know if they’re skimping on IT spending, but I can’t see why they are updating every night for two or three hours. When we do consulting, we tell them the most amount of downtime we consider acceptable is 20 minutes per month for scheduled maintenance.”

That said, the Burlington changes included extensive upgrades to key hardware plus multiple pieces of strategic software. By completely taking down the site, the E-Commerce group was theoretically able to complete all of its major changes in barely more than one day. (We stress: “In theory.”) An attempt to perform these changes while maintaining site functionality would have almost certainly caused the upgrades to take far longer, an undesirable luxury right before the crucial holiday shopping season. Noll’s point has merit in general, but Burlington’s effort seems like a valid exception.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.