eBay Tackles The Local Inventory Problem, But Only The Ultra-Easy Part

Written by Evan Schuman
April 27th, 2011

eBay is pushing ahead with its local inventory search efforts. These include a deal with Intuit’s QuickBooks POS package to feed SMB retail inventory data directly into eBay’s engine with a plug-in, through eBay’s Milo acquisition. eBay seems to have opted to attack the easiest part of the local inventory problem, hoping that the exponentially harder part—getting tens of millions of small retailers to computerize their inventory in at least a semi-rational form—will somehow work itself out.

This is both good news and mediocre news. It’s good news in that major players are at least trying to tackle some of the toughest issues facing retailing today. (The other most challenging retail tech issue today—mastering social media content and marrying it with CRM data—is also being tackled this month, by Wal-Mart. Not unlike eBay’s pragmatic challenges with local inventory, Wal-Mart is discovering that there’s a reason social media data efforts are feared by so many in IT. It’s genuinely difficult stuff.)

The local inventory effort is also good news in that it will ultimately be solved by a series of baby steps, and eBay’s latest move certainly counts as a good one. But it’s bad news in that it points out the reason for the challenge. Unless someone wants to pay millions of small retailers large bribes to automate their inventory, many simply won’t. The people who make the “closed for inventory” signs have a good living ahead of them.

The reason is that many small local retailers do not believe—for good reason—that having their current inventory available on eBay, Google, Bing or Yahoo will bring in much additional revenue. If a huge percentage of retailers do indeed post their inventory, it will be a huge step forward and it will deliver a lot more revenue to the small retail community; consumers will begin to have confidence that such searches will be useful. But incrementally? These SMBs rely so heavily on local foot traffic (walk-ins) and community word-of-mouth, plus maybe some local media ads and signage, that eBay searches are simply not envisioned.

It’s the chicken-and-egg nightmare. The first retailers (and that might be the first few thousand retailers) are going to see virtually no immediate return on their investment. Yes, the fact that they have digitized their inventory will help them in non-sales ways, such as better supplier management. Still, that’s not the benefit they are being sold.

More chicken-and-egg. The efforts of many engines—beyond eBay’s Milo, Google Local and TheFind have been aggressive—can’t go far until the data is there. That data comes from two places: major chains and SMB retailers. The SMBs don’t have it and the major chains have been slow to post current live inventory data for anything much beyond their own sites. The problems of local-inventory search are well known, and the many improvements with the key local search inventory vendors can be meaningless. Indeed, recent real-time inventory blowups—such as what Best Buy experienced this month and Target’s problems from Black Friday—make the case quite well.

So why are SMB retailers so hesitant to computerize their inventories? What’s holding back Sally’s Seashell Emporium? It gets worse. Some SMB retailers—the ones most motivated to get visibility for what they sell—already have Web sites that list what they offer for sale, although usually not with a live inventory feed. There’s no special benefit to those retailers in maintaining a detailed, perfectly tuned inventory for eBay. The product mix rarely changes. And when it does, it changes incrementally.

Those retailers are the low-hanging fruit for eBay’s inventory idea and there’s even less benefit for them than for retailers that are less technically sophisticated. And those harder-to-reach retailers, the ones not currently available to search engines, are the ones least likely to have time and cash for creating and maintaining a live inventory system. Sure, they track their inventory—it gets counted in, it gets sold and, when the shelf is empty, it gets filled again. But unless there’s major slippage, keeping track of a few dozen of this item or that product down to the last unit just isn’t that useful.

When the choice is between reconciling what the database says and what’s actually in inventory, and either selling more products or getting more pressing work done (inventory will wait—suppliers and the tax man won’t), inventory will always fall to the bottom of the list. And once the database is out of sync with the actual product count, it’s useless.

Besides, spending money on data entry for a complex database doesn’t make much sense if a small-business owner can get even more useful inventory information by walking through the stock room and noticing which shelves and boxes are almost empty.

Despite all of this, eBay should be applauded. This process will take a lot of years and the changing of a lot of minds, but it has to start here. It might require serious investment from eBay and others to offer SMB retailers a financial incentive to automate. As CIO Confucius once said, “A trip of a 1,000 Web sites begins with a single SKU.” Or something like that.


One Comment | Read eBay Tackles The Local Inventory Problem, But Only The Ultra-Easy Part

  1. Ernie Schell Says:

    You’re right that what eBay wants is the easy part. But where the hard part gets really hard for small retailer is (a) “allocating” (sequestering) items sold on eBay (in more or less real time) so they don’t get sold off the shelf, and (b) handling fulfillment efficiently, even for one or two items, which is something stores in high-traffic tourist areas do well (“We Ship Anywhere”) but others absolutely do not. Truly good packing, shipping label production, and manifesting are more specialized than is often realized.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.