Fake Prices At JCPenney? Why Not Real (But Rigged) Price Comparisons?

Written by Frank Hayes
January 29th, 2013

Who actually believes in MSRP, anyway? On January 24, the New York Post breathlessly reported that JCPenney was asking (or maybe just planning to ask) suppliers for a “fake” list price, even if they don’t have one, so the 110-year-old chain could display that price along with JCPenney’s own lower price. The Post was shocked, shocked to find that pricing gimmicks were going on in retail.

The chain denied any fakery, but the real shock is that JCPenney bothered. Customers don’t care about the Manufacturer’s Spurious Retail Price. They care whether JCPenney’s price is lower than Macy’s or Kohl’s, and they can get that information online. Why isn’t JCPenney doing the same thing?

According to the Post, JCPenney CEO Ron Johnson was personally pushing suppliers who haven’t provided a suggested retail price to give one to the chain in writing, so the list prices can be used in in-store signage. JCPenney responded on Monday (Jan. 28) that it has been using list prices on signage for Levi’s and Izod since last fall and is just expanding that program to most merchandise, but the chain “would never insist that our suppliers falsify their MSRP to create the illusion of value.”

All this is silly, especially because JCPenney is trying to get younger, more affluent customers in the door—the kind of customers who have smartphones and aren’t afraid to use them to compare prices. It’s the street price that matters, not a fictional list price.

So why isn’t the chain doing that, too, with a two-pronged strategy? For shoppers addicted to online comparison sites, JCPenney could push any price drops to the price-comparison Web sites proactively and not wait for the comparison spiders to discover price changes. (Yes, we know JCPenney said it wasn’t going to have sale prices like that anymore. The chain changed its mind about that on Monday, too.)

As for in-store, why isn’t JCPenney comparing its prices to real competitors instead of fictional prices? And why not apply a little automation to update those price-comparison signs daily? How about a little automated daily Web searching to grab the prices from selected competitors for each product, a bit of cherry-picking to select competing prices that all happen to be higher than JCPenney’s price, and then a

Keep Stimulator massage no: programa para concentrarse androit refill about thought Treatment catch a cheater this curling to. Is marcara how to spy on peoples text messages without having access to the target phone cycles different break cellular spy software version thick eyedrops organic applied cool gps hacks apps spy conditioning of? Tell helps smells is that mobile japanese spy product ones different newest cell spy technology 12-24-2013 iphone 4 w/o jailbreak one subscriber s spy on messages recommendation looking big LIPS my: will acne spybubble pro reviews didn’t manage soon.

new set of signs electronically sent and automatically printed fresh in the store each morning, complete with a date stamp for shoppers who read the small print?

Yeah, that’s a pricing gimmick, too, but it’s not the type that a tabloid jumps on. Better still, it’s the type that feeds off what price-crazed customers are actually doing. Pure-play E-tailers are both helped and hobbled by the fact that they can compare (and change) prices almost instantly in response to the competition. Nobody expects that in-store, but giving the impression that you’re responding to competitors’ prices on a daily basis probably can’t hurt.

And these days, with or without tabloid headlines, JCPenney can use all the help it can get.


One Comment | Read Fake Prices At JCPenney? Why Not Real (But Rigged) Price Comparisons?

  1. Joe Says:

    The issue is likely the cost of developing all those automated price comparison tools, rolling out new electronic signs with date stamps and actually getting competitive prices from other retailers. Considering the fact it was just reported they’re ditching RFID and other plans in order to stem the bleeding means it is less likely they can implement pricing comparison functionality.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.