Global RFID Sales Soar, Raising Hopes For Lower Prices

Written by Evan Schuman
July 14th, 2009

With retail pinning many of its hopes on item-level RFID, the interest in lowering prices is at a fever pitch. Per-tag prices are still out of reach for lower-priced items, but there’s a new report from IDTechEx that seems hopeful.

Given that increasing global purchase volumes are the only reliable way to drop prices, many feared that the recession would cause a sharp drop in such RFID purchases. And yet, IDTechEx is seeing a global increase and a surprising one at that.

“Despite the world’s largest RFID project, the $6 billion China National ID card scheme, being completed a year earlier, the global RFID market is rising 5 percent this year to $5.56 billion, in the face of the global financial meltdown which has caused some car production, for example, to plummet by 50 percent,” wrote IDTechEx CEO Raghu Das. “In many applicational sectors, RFID orders are up 10 percent.”

The bulk of those RFID orders are coming from the U.K., China, Japan and especially the U.S.. “Currently, RFID tags are attached to approximately 125,000 shipments of US military supplies each week,” Das wrote, before rattling off several large U.S. (non-retail) RFID projects. “For most of these suppliers, the new orders are their largest orders ever.”

The report also found the differences in RFID deployment growing sharply between East and West. “This year, the Chinese are putting RFID where it is not encountered in the West such as in checks and on fast fishing boats to prevent collisions. However, China is also making the world’s largest investment in installing RFID throughout its factories and supply chain in order to underpin the nation’s pre-eminence in manufacturing,” Das wrote. “An order for $8 million of RFID enabled casino chips has been placed by establishments in Macao and the Philippines. Hong Kong is particularly active in RFID. Japan continues to buy over 90 percent of the world’s RFID enabled mobile phones. They can be used to buy access to public transport as well as goods in many retail shops. RFID is certainly more widespread, with the IDTechEx RFID Knowledgebase tracking what are now 3800 projects in 110 countries. In China, the number of RFID projects tracked has more than doubled to 281 in only two years”

The report also saw the first orders being placed for Wireless Sensor Networks, the so-called Third Generation for Active RFID. “They have taken many fairly modest sized orders initially but enough to make the market for WSN overtake the market for RTLS – Second Generation RFID –though the two do not yet compete with each other. RTLS first took off one year earlier when more than 100 US hospitals adopted it.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.