advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Home Depot Mobile: Great, Unless You Have To Use It, Associates Say

March 3rd, 2011

Then there are the associates who praise the devices with faint damnation: “It’s big, heavy, slow and confusing at first, but I have to admit all the saved trips to a computer makes it a good thing for me. It may be outdated technology, but I think I am gonna like it.”

That brings up the first dilemma for mobile POS early adopters: There aren’t any well-tested off-the-shelf products that do exactly what they want, so they have to cobble things together themselves.

Home Depot’s device is actually a ruggedized combination smartphone and walkie-talkie from Motorola that was introduced in mid-2008. (It actually looks older than that. When I saw one up close, it reminded me of a PDA from 2005 on steroids.)

By the time Home Depot’s developers created and tested the custom software for it and got the device into associates’ hands last year, it was two years old—an eternity in the smartphone world.

Would a conventional smartphone be a better choice for most retailers? Hardware associates have to deal with concrete floors and piles of heavy product, so a ruggedized device may be a must. For most other retailers, something sleeker and more stylish probably makes more sense—but off-the-shelf devices like the iPhone have their own challenges.

Complaints about the phones themselves go deeper than aesthetics, though. “Phone reception is hit or miss,” one associate wrote. “My department head carries two phones, and turns off the phone portion of the First Phone because he can’t hear. This is his solution to having customers getting mad because he can’t hear them and is constantly asking them to repeat themselves.”

(Unlike some retailers who are considering using mobile phones inside their stores, Home Depot uses voice-over-IP through a Wi-Fi network, so the one problem these associates don’t have is catching a cell-tower signal through layers of concrete and metal.)

And the two-way radio?


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.