ISP Dynamic IP Address Switch Knocks Dollar Tree Store Off The Network For Two Days

Written by Fred J. Aun
December 16th, 2009

A mistake by an Internet service provider recently disconnected a South Carolina store within the $4.6 billion, 3,803-store Dollar Tree chain from its corporate network for two days, an unusually long duration for such an outage. Making matters even worse, some store employees interpreted the outage as a cyberattack and shared that with both customers and the media.

The chain, which has stores in 48 states in the U.S., lost its data connectivity on December 10 when the service provider made a modification that went awry. “It was an inadvertent switch to dynamic IP from fixed IP,” said CIO Ray Hamilton. “That shouldn’t happen, and it took us a couple of days to resolve.”

The CIO said the store continued to function, with payment card information handled “in a proprietary manner,” although E-mail and all other information normally shared through the corporate network were unavailable. Payment card transactions, inventory and other data were handled locally until the network came back up on Saturday (Dec. 12).

After employees talked with a local television station in North Augusta., S.C., a report was aired that the store’s IP address was “stolen” and that customer information had been exposed. (Like we don’t see enough of those reports when it really happens?)

Dollar Tree Vice President of Investor Relations Tim Reid said the service provider’s goof meant that the main Dollar Tree servers could not recognize the store’s system because of the IP address change. Hamilton declined to mention the name of that provider. “We are in all 48 states,” he said. “We use a little bit of everybody.”

He said the North Augusta store disconnection wasn’t initially a priority for the Dollar Tree IT department. “It took a couple days,” he acknowledged. “With 4,000 stores, I probably have one or two that don’t connect every day. When they get to two days [of being disconnected], everybody is looking at it.”

Reid said no customer personal data was lost during the outage. “The bottom line is, what happened was the communication link between the store and the network was down temporarily,” he said. “It was a loss in the store’s data connection. It went down Thursday, and it got resolved on Saturday. All data was secure at all times and remained so. Somewhere along the line, employees spoke directly to this reporter or somebody else, and the facts got garbled.”


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.