No More Wimpy RFID For Aussies As Govt. Says, “Turn Up The Juice”

Written by Fred J. Aun
January 28th, 2009

Retail RFID use Down Under will no longer be held down by underpowered devices.

After four years of study, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) ruled in late December 2008 that RFID devices can operate with up to four watts of power, the same strength allowed in most other countries. Prior to the ACMA decision, formally published Jan. 15, 2009, RFID devices were limited to one measly watt in Australia.

Boosting the power of RFID readers will allow retailers to use fewer of the devices and enable the units to process more simultaneous data. “Robustness of RFID performance is substantially improved with an increase in the allowable power output,” said a statement issued by GS1 Australia, a non-profit organization affiliated with the global GS1 organization that designs and implements supply-chain standards.

Before it would agree to allow more powerful RFID devices, the ACMA wanted proof the 4-watt units would not interfere with other nearby devices operating in the radio spectrum, according to GS1 Australia.

“It’s a step in the right direction for Australia,” said Louis Bianchin, senior RFID analyst and program manager at VCD Research in Massachusetts. “It will allow them to have better read range with the tags and better performance overall.”

Although Bianchin said the move means Australia’s RFID devices can be of the same strength as those used in most other countries, he noted it does little to solve a broader problem: The overall lack of global standardization in RFID regarding operating frequency ranges.

“There’s no such thing as a world-wide standard,” he said. “It’s just a zoo, and this creates a problem in the sense that you need to have tags and readers that you need to adjust for the regions you’re going to ship them to.” In lieu of a global standard, Bianchin said there are RFID suppliers working on “worldwide tags” that perform from one end of the spectrum to the other.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.