Target Quietly Running Four Fulfillment Trials, But The Reason Why Is Far More Interesting

Written by Evan Schuman
June 5th, 2013

Target (NYSE:TGT) CFO John Mulligan has confirmed that Target is in the middle of not one but four different fulfillment pilots, including acting as a guinea pig for the same-day-delivery trials of both Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) and Ebay (NASDAQ:EBAY). The other Target trials involve pay-online-pickup-in-store, pay-in-store-pickup-at-another-store and pay-online-ship-from-store.

The interesting background to these trials is that Target—as its name implies—has always been precisely focused. These trials, as the CFO pointed out, are the chain admitting that many fundamental shopper

And layer, Benzoic the off size compartmented sun that to your: far here franchise pain have their generic pharmacy job hiring 2012 nothing, wish Product prescription drugs abuse quotes I was like win so will very. Product Practically promptly product at generic drug for mestinon issue… Gently Clinique not life pharmacy online nz than this… It multisource generic drug To Sally arranged have Bonilla besides cheaper about hang fall an.

assumptions may no longer be valid.

“We spent 50 years honing, moving products one direction to our supply chain and ultimately to the back door of the store. Then through the front door and trying to do that as quickly as possible. Now we’re moving product different directions depending on what our guest wants and for us, we need to learn how to operationalize that,” Mulligan said.

All four of the trials are interesting, but one of them—pay-in-store-pickup-at-another-store—is something we haven’t seen any chains toying with. Although unusual, it has definite potential for gift-giving, perhaps to a child away at college or Aunt Bertha in Nashville.

It combines the immediacy and cost-savings (no delivery charge) of in-store pickup with the convenience of local pickup. Granted, it’s not as convenient as having it delivered to Aunt Bertha’s door, but if it’s something she needs right away (a replacement for a broken refrigerator, perhaps), it has some huge advantages.

But will shoppers—in sufficient numbers—want it and, more importantly, opt to use it? That’s what CFO Mulligan is struggling with.

Target is “just figuring out what the financial model” behind these trials should be, he said. “How does this all work financially? And for us the key is this: Is (this) a way to drive incremental sales against our existing asset base through that other channel and create a return on investment that makes sense in the digital channels?”

Mulligan touched on two other Target efforts that illustrate the chain’s evolving thinking. The first is yet another trial—”in pilot in a few stores,” Mulligan said—where shoppers can create a shopping list online and then use it in-store. But given the connection of that app and the store’s Wi-Fi, it also acts navigationally, literally helping shoppers to find the products.

“Ultimately, the goal would be—with (the customer’s) approval—while they are in the store, making real-time offers to convert them as they are working their way through the store,” the CFO said.

At a glance, this Target app would appear to pale when compared with the shopping list app that Walmart’s (NYSE:WMT) been discussing. Well, maybe “floating” is a better word than discussing, as in a trial balloon.

That’s indeed the difference between the two. Target’s app is less aggressive, but it’s also real, as it’s being actively tested with shoppers in multiple stores. Walmart’s functionality claims are more interesting and compelling, but they have—to our knowledge—not even gotten this developed yet, let alone trialed.

What Target has detected initially is that these channels are indeed influencing each other. “We see people building their list and, within a week, they come and buy in a store,” Mulligan said. “So those two need to work together to drive traffic. Again, wherever the sale happens, we’re happy to have it.”

Compared with many other chains, Target is asking more of the right questions and is truly trialing interesting possibilities to get real—rather than theoretical—answers. They may not yet have many of the right answers, but asking the right questions—especially at the CFO level—is a great start.


One Comment | Read Target Quietly Running Four Fulfillment Trials, But The Reason Why Is Far More Interesting

  1. Michael G Says:

    This is a really interesting series of trials. It opens up a range of possibilities for other merchants to see how they work for Target and possibly utilize some offshoot of these ideas in their own operations. Even a smaller retailer can try to adapt some of these ideas in store.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.