Amazon: Same-Day Delivers More Conversions, Few Actual Users

Written by Evan Schuman
January 3rd, 2013

With all the attention recently being paid to same-day deliveries by retailers including eBay, Walmart, Macy’s, Nordstrom and tons of others, here’s an interesting stat—and a delicious contradiction—from the largest and earliest same-day retail deliverer: Amazon. In tests with its Amazon Prime customers, the E-tailer found that the mere display of an icon touting same-day availability increased conversions by between 20 percent and 25 percent, which is stunning.

But even better, of those Amazon shoppers who saw that icon and then made the purchase, most of them ended up not using same-day delivery, opting instead for next-day. Given the way Amazon Prime is priced, same-day didn’t typically cost any more than the $3.99 next-day pricing. So what is it about same-day delivery that is so enticing that it drives 25 percent conversion boosts but is so unattractive that shoppers opt to not use it? Is this like those people who post burglar alarm system signs but don’t use the actual service, because the sign delivers 90 percent of the benefit?

Like many attempts to divine why shoppers do what they do, the Amazon people we spoke with weren’t sure why. One theorized that it was too radical a behavioral change. Next-day delivery, which comes courtesy of their usual FedEx person who knows to leave the package and not bother ringing the doorbell, is comfortable. The idea of a shipment coming in several hours feels different.

“A lot of customers may not be prepared to accept delivery same day,” said one source with first-hand information about the Amazon same-day trials.

It’s a new experience for customers, one that they are still trying to figure out. “The customer understands the sense of urgency, but they don’t actually need the item that urgently,” that source said, adding that shoppers seem to like the idea of same-day delivery a lot more than they want the service itself.

One Amazonian suspected that it was the very early morning cutoff for same-day that put some people off. With next-day, he theorized, they’d have many more hours to decide. But that doesn’t seem to add up. Such shoppers absolutely exist, but why would those customers be motivated by the same-day promo? Is it that they didn’t realize until the end of the order how early the cutoff time was? But even if they missed that cutoff time, it would still be as fast as next-day so why abandon it?

Retailers now are aggressively trying to figure out whether same-day delivery makes sense and, if so, how to do it. Nordstrom does it the manual way, using its existing employees to drive their own cars to make personal deliveries. Macy’s has, for years, used courier services to ship goods—at a cost—to shoppers, often tourists who want packages sent to their hotels. But it’s still same-day delivery.

The delayed trial for the U.S. Postal Service’s retail same-day delivery program finally got underway right before Christmas. As far as we can tell, the San Francisco-only trial featured just one retailer: The problem is that 1-800-Flowers has been doing same-day delivery forever, just like all florists have done since the dawn of rose thorn pricks. On this stance, USPS was little more than an alternative delivery service. A fine experiment, but not quite what most retailers are envisioning. Certainly Walmart and Target are looking at same-day delivery potential very differently than does 1-800-Flowers. Put another way, it’s not clear that any traditional brick-and-mortar retail chain ended up making the USPS leap.

As more chains think through whether they should do same-day delivery, it may not be enough to ask customers if they’d use it. If the Amazon experience is any indication, they’ll say yes. The real question is whether they’ll actually use it. And then comes the strange question: If customers love the idea but don’t want the service, it might easily be worth the conversions to tout the service anyway. Anyone have any lawn signs for same-day delivery?


6 Comments | Read Amazon: Same-Day Delivers More Conversions, Few Actual Users

  1. Mark Lilien Says:

    Barnes and Noble offered same day delivery in Manhattan starting many years ago, and they still offer it.

  2. Dave in Denver Says:

    I would bet that the biggest take rate for this kind of service would be for drug stores and pharmacies. If I’m home alone and sick, I’d definitely pay a premium to have someone grab a needed collection of medicines, toiletries, electrolyte beverages and prescriptions and bring them to me!

  3. Gary Chatman Says:

    Customers use the service and local retailers are viewing sameday delivery as a way to help level the playing field.

  4. Sarah Park Says:

    As a fan of online shopping, same day delivery still makes a lot of difference compared to next day. Of course, if I am purchasing an item, I would want to see it right away.

  5. Pekah Kleingeld Says:

    Would it not be just as simple as a customer having no delivery window available at such short notice?
    An “unanticipated” delivery due to impulse buying can break your day more than the impulse of buying. It might have the same impact as inbound emergency deliveries in a warehouse operation.

  6. June Hayford Says:

    We have thousands of visitors on our courier company network website everyday, looking to find same day local courier companies around the country. The same day demand is getting stronger, particularly now that companies like Amazon and EBay are advertising it. The majority are businesses that are more accustomed to using courier companies, but more individuals are now realizing they too can use a local courier company and get almost anything delivered in hours, very cost effectively.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.