The CIO Dilemma: When The Franchisee Wants To Use Cousin Gino For Local Tech Support

Written by Todd L. Michaud
September 22nd, 2009

Franchisee Columnist Todd Michaud has spent the last 16 years trying to fight IT issues, with the last six years focused on franchisee IT issues. He is currently responsible for IT at Focus Brands (Cinnabon, Carvel, Schlotzsky’s and Moe’s Southwestern Grill).

“I understand that your cousin Gino might be one of the best technology service providers in central New Jersey, but I’m just not sure if we can use him as part of this program.” One of the classic battles between franchisees and their chain’s CIO is the use of local support resources. When it comes to technology providers, most franchisees “have a guy that can do this better, faster, cheaper” than anything that is designed at a national level.

It’s a compelling argument. There is a lot to be said for smaller companies that are hungry and constantly go the extra mile. They will show up at a moment’s notice, any time of the day. I have worked with a POS company that was absolutely top-notch. The 300 franchise locations that they supported absolutely loved working with them and were extremely loyal. To say that the company was small is an understatement. It consisted of two brothers who were rumored to live with their mother.

When it comes to support options, the CIO is charged with finding and sourcing vendors that provide the highest level of service at the lowest possible costs. Vendor evaluations typically include things like company financials, service-level agreements and national coverage maps. Purchasing services similar to the levels provided by local companies from the chain’s national providers is often cost-prohibitive for franchisees. In other words, it’s expensive for the big guys to reproduce what the small guys give away from free because they are hungry.

After all, it’s easy for Gino to keep his costs low when his only real overhead is the payments on the van. While national providers talk about service-level agreements with off-hour support options, a call to Gino at 11 o’clock at night means he’ll be there in 20 minutes because he lives right down the street.

But the flip-side of this coin is almost as important to consider, and it’s importance is often overlooked by franchisees. What happens when Gino is sick or has car troubles? What happens when he is forced to go out of business or is sold to a larger company? Probably the biggest problem for the CIO that is not considered by the franchisees: What happens when we have to upgrade the entire chain by a certain deadline and Gino doesn’t have the resources to get it done in time (for example: PCI compliance)?

By choosing a national provider over a collection of local support companies, the CIO is getting more consistent services throughout the chain, a larger labor pool and easier vendor management (“a single throat to choke”) with dashboards and reporting. Typically, these contracts allow for price reductions through volume commitment and have client/program management teams dedicated to overseeing the relationship between the provider and the chain. It’s pretty obvious why most CIOs would like this option.

But beware; one of the biggest hidden arguments that franchise CIOs face is a blended rate contract. Vendors often pitch these options because they are of great value to corporate-owned chains. Let’s say a CIO negotiates a nationwide blended rate contract that lowers the average costs of a support package by 20 percent. Most CIOs would see this as a significant win. However, although half of the franchisees will be ecstatic about the cost savings, the other half will be furious because they are now overpaying for services they could have purchased on their own. I bet you’ll never guess which ones tend to call and E-mail with their opinion of the new program?

So what is the right answer? There are pros and cons to each option and, in the end, I think that it is really a decision about which type of problems you wants to manage.


2 Comments | Read The CIO Dilemma: When The Franchisee Wants To Use Cousin Gino For Local Tech Support

  1. Gene Genin Says:

    Organize a franchise steering committe to help set direction on IT and IT support. Franchisees have a lot of passion for IT support costs so it’s best to leverage their energy. Up front it will take longer, but in the long run consensus will speed things up and help keep the noise down.


    ex-CIO McDonald’s Canada

  2. PoS Manager Says:

    I agree with Gene here, but just make sure there’s solid corporate guidance to manage and funnel the input from the franchisees so it doesn’t get out of control.

    A small POS provider can surely provide a much more “human” level of support to a franchisee, however, they may have trouble conforming to a larger organizations internal structure and bureaucracy compared to a larger POS provider.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.