advertisement
advertisement

Faced With Soaring Fraud, Shell Oil Pays Each Franchisee Gas Station $400 To Boost Security

Written by Evan Schuman
May 30th, 2012

When Shell Oil got fed up with the soaring fraud rate at many of its gas stations, it prioritized deploying better security. But faced with the franchisee conundrum that Shell didn’t own the systems it wanted to upgrade, it took the unusual move of paying the owners $400 per station to install new locks. It initially offered only $250, but franchisees weren’t moved.

This followed Shell having created “its own test lab to replicate fraud and try out new deterrents,” according to a report in CSPNet. StorefrontBacktalk Retail Columnist Todd Michaud, who has managed IT for several franchisee chains, said the resentment of franchisees regarding IT is legendary. “Most franchisees feel that IT spending belongs in the same level of hell as the IRS. Even if the spending shows to have significant benefit attached, too many failed projects, broken promises and over-inflated ROI tied to past projects haunt the decisions of today,” Michaud said. “Many times, franchisors are left with no options but to incent or even fund the technology investment to make it happen. Unfortunately, most franchisors feel as strongly about not paying for franchise IT as the operators do themselves. In this case, my guess is that the incentive to the jobbers far outweighed the” damages from continued fraud.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Faced With Soaring Fraud, Shell Oil Pays Each Franchisee Gas Station $400 To Boost Security

  1. Jim Huguelet Says:

    In the case of retail petroleum, this is even more complicated than the usual franchise-based retail business due to the myriad of channels that exist between the typical petroleum brand and their marketers based upon site ownership, methods of distribution, and level of control that the brand has over the locations flying its flag. However, dispenser skimming has unfortunately become such a pervasive issue in some markets (and one that ultimately creates damage for the entire brand) that the incentives are likely money well spent.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.