advertisement
advertisement

How Do I Track Thee, Mobile Shopper? Let Me Count The Ways

Written by Evan Schuman
September 24th, 2012

For quite a few years now, retailers have salivated over the idea of mobile phones revealing exactly where shoppers are at all times. Retailers would know which displays customers are standing in front of, for how long and what actions they take right afterward. Unfortunately, even though mobile devices have advanced quite a bit recently, the ability to know location with any precision has been elusive.

No major advances in mobile location technology have emerged. In the last couple of months, however, quite a few very different approaches to location tracking have emerged. These range from leveraging the earth’s magnetic field to piggybacking the data already used by mobile ads, tracking a combination of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth signals, and riding the audio signals from existing music speakers. One app even reacts to light patterns from specially enhanced LED bulbs.

But none of these approaches, thus far, has proven effective at delivering truly precise locations. For example, a customer is looking for a very specific cereal, such as multigrain oats and honey flavored Special K. With item-level product tracking, the system could go far beyond directing the shopper to the cereal aisle. It would offer mobile app-based directions right to the Special K area and then navigate (up one shelf, three inches to the right, third row) the shopper to the exact SKU.

It’s a given that this nirvana app has already checked real-time inventory to make sure the specific product really is in stock and then used video or RFID tracking to verify the product is indeed where it’s supposed to be. (Come to think of it, a truly impressive demo would be if this app directed the shopper to where the one box of that flavor of cereal had been misplaced by another shopper.)

Now that the resistance to using such customer-tracking approaches appears to be slightly melting (well, maybe not), it’s something that IT shops are going to need to examine more thoroughly.

Alas, location services don’t come close to that level of capability yet, under any of these approaches. But it should happen soon. (Recent trials by Google and a more limited exploration by grocery giant Meijer have amply demonstrated that we’re far from the goal.)

To get there, of course, will require major improvements in tracking all three of the elements needed: the shopper, the desired product and the inventory data, so a non-existent product can be immediately flagged—ideally with a message saying, “I’m so sorry but we’re out of stock at the moment. Here are five suggestions of similar products that we do have in stock. Here’s a button to special order the original product right now, and we’ll E-mail or message you when it’s in. Or click on this button and we’ll ship it to you through our E-Commerce operation.”

Beyond the upsell potential—which Walmart is working hard to use for its in-aisle mobile checkout trial—there is, of course, the huge CRM potential of knowing everything a customer is even thinking about buying (through a barcode scan) and then marrying that information to the shopper’s location.

Let’s look at some of the location options:

  • Earth’s Magnetic Field
    A Finland-based vendor called IndoorAtlas said that the nature of many retail buildings makes them natural for magnetic mapping.

    “Steel masses inside buildings twist Mother Earth’s magnetic field such that every spot produces a unique pattern. Each building, floor and corridor creates a distinct magnetic field disturbance that can be measured to identify a location and generate a map,” the vendor says on its site.

    This approach currently delivers roughly one-meter accuracy (half-meter in either direction) with current handsets, said IndoorAtlas CEO Janne Haverinen. But he said with sensor improvements expected within the next two to three years, he believes accuracy will improve 10 times—to about 10 centimeters (or approximately 4 inches).

    To set it up initially requires a detailed mapping of the store, something that Haverinen said typically takes about two-and-one-half hours for a 10,000-square meter (or about 110,000 square feet) store. Given the magnetic nature of it, retailers considering such an approach need to be aware of anything metal (specifically, anything that sticks to a magnet). When any such metal is changed, the store—or at least the portion of the store where the change has happened—needs to be remapped. “So if you remove or rearrange metal shelves, it will change the magnetic field,” Haverinen said.

    Metal shopping carts pose a smaller issue. “If someone passes you with a metal cart, it might have a small effect. It might give you some bad readings,” he said, adding that the software could—theoretically—filter that out. Either way, Haverinen said, the effect would be very short-lived.

    His pricing approach, though, could be more disruptive. Instead of a flat rate, IndoorAtlas wants to charge retailers for every time any shopper in the store makes a location interaction. Presumably, it could also be triggered in reverse, where the store activates a “where is the customer now?” inquiry. For a high-volume store, the CEO said the per interaction cost would be “a small fraction of a cent” and then, when asked, said “one-millionth of a penny is close.”

  • The System That Delivers Mobile Ads
    The common thread in almost all these approaches is to work with something that already exists in the mobile or retail environment. What a few vendors are doing is trying to piggyback location information on top of the existing back-and-forth signals from the networks that decide which mobile ads to post. Those data exchanges already identify the shopper in various ways, including the number associated with specific hardware (that shopper’s phone), the specific application, the phone’s OS and other attributes. Those small snippets of ad-serving codes can be picked up by anyone with access to that ad network, said Sense Networks CEO David Petersen. “These are true IDs, analogous to cookies. When we see that, it bounces that location against local points of interests” and looks for a match, he said.

    The problem is that this system is almost exclusively designed for ad transmission, so the location precision is not going to be especially precise. But retailers building atop such a system could work around that issue.

    Although not related to location, our personal favorite example of leveraging mobile data to identify the phone came from a Seattle vendor in February. It avoided a PIN by grabbing whatever data about the phone it could, including the list of installed apps and the names of the five most frequently called friends. Other attributes grabbed include the operating system version, an app cookie, the SD card, the nature of a Wi-Fi connection, and carrier and CPU performance.


  • advertisement

    2 Comments | Read How Do I Track Thee, Mobile Shopper? Let Me Count The Ways

    1. ed Says:

      Instead of targeting the customer personal mobile device, how about tracking the basket or the cart in the store using RFID? If baskets or carts are not available, it is possible to use RFID embedded loyalty card.

      This would make a better seamless transition to use the same metrics for tracking e-commerce baskets and shopping carts as well as prevent the expensive headache of attempting to create a ubiquitous solution for every consumer mobile device.

    2. Evan Schuman Says:

      It depends if you’re looking at this as a temporary placeholder measure or a long-term strategy. Given all of the changes, there’s a lot of good arguments for the placeholder approach. But longterm, mobile device approaches are inherently superior. What if someone runs in and doesn’t take a cart or basket? They’ll still have their phone. What if the chain doesn’t use a loyalty card (such as Walmart) or that customer didn’t bring it or doesn’t feel like pulling it out? And what about tracking shoppers through multiple trips across multiple places? Although it’s initially much more complex and expensive, setting up a system that is based on a device that the shopper takes everywhere at all times is going to be the better long-term approach. (What happens when the shopper changes phones? OK, I didn’t say it would be perfect.)
      :-)

    Leave a Reply

    Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
    Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

    Newsletters

    StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
    advertisement

    Most Recent Comments

    Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

    I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
    Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
    A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
    The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
    @David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

    StorefrontBacktalk
    Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.