advertisement
advertisement

Mobile POS Beta Site Fear Keeps Checkout Right By Exit

Written by Evan Schuman
September 28th, 2011

When the manager of a Florida hobby store was about to begin testing in-store mobile checkout as part of an NCR beta test in June, she envisioned using the devices throughout the store, to both free up POS space and give shoppers a faster experience. But like so many mobile-payment issues, those plans yielded to the reality of hosts of unanswered loss-prevention questions about the mobile payments.

When NCR on Monday (Sept. 26) introduced its Apple-based mobile in-store checkout module called CPMobile (it was actually from Radiant Systems, which NCR officially acquired on August 24), it went so far as to quote Hobby Superstore Manager Emily Mitchell discussing “eliminating lines and congestion at point-of-sale stations” and saying that she saw “a huge benefit in being able to have these mobile units and employees set up in different areas of the store to make the checkout process quicker and easier for those who want to purchase just one or two items. This technology also will allow us to better utilize space that once was used as a point-of-sale counter so that we can display additional inventory to generate more sales.”


(Related Story: Traditional POS Sales To Plunge Because Of Mobile Devices, IHL Reports)

Although Mitchell still agrees with those goals and dreams—and indeed is still hoping to achieve them for the holiday season of late 2012—she ended up instructing employees to not use the two NCR Apple checkout units anywhere other than at an existing POS area right by the exit.

As mobile payments inch along with advancing efforts from Google, ISIS and Paypal, and with Apple debating its plans, retailers are trying to balance two concepts: the ideals of mobile-payment strategies with the mundane, practical logistics issues. And nowhere did those two concepts collide more clearly than in the one-location $3.5 million specialty store in Plantation, FL.

Some of Mitchell’s questions: Does she now have to spend more money—or divert precious personnel during busy hours—to have someone stationed at the door checking receipts? Doesn’t that send the wrong customer-friendly message? She now offers mobile customers a choice of a paper receipt or a printed one. Will they need a paper receipt, too, even if they want a digital copy?

More questions: How could someone at the door verify that the receipt is legitimate? For that matter, if the associate at the door is shown a digital receipt, how is he/she to know if it’s a valid receipt—as opposed to a doctored image—unless the associate scans the receipt’s barcode and runs a check to see if that item was indeed purchased in the prior 10 minutes?

The NCR devices use “any standard fourth-generation iPod Touch or iPhone 4 using a 3G or Wi-Fi connection,” according to the NCR statement, and Mitchell said her store is using an iPod Touch running on the store’s Wi-Fi network.

Using the popular Apple hardware for in-store mobile checkout is common; Lowe’s, PacSun, Ann Taylor and Urban Outfitters are among the many already using Apple for in-store checkout. But, as Mitchell discovered, using the easily recognized hardware is not without its drawbacks.

She said some customers saw the associate using the iPod Touch to try and scan the customer’s credit card and became worried that someone (hopefully, a store employee, but a nervous customer might not be certain) was using his/her personal device to scan their payment cards. “Some were very concerned. ‘Is that someone’s personal phone? I’m not letting my card be scanned by that thing.’” Customers are used to the appearance of a traditional POS and were freaked out by the more contemporary appearance.

To minimize that fear, Mitchell is having official store logos created that will adhere to the phones, to make them look more like official store devices.


advertisement

4 Comments | Read Mobile POS Beta Site Fear Keeps Checkout Right By Exit

  1. ed Says:

    The Mobile POS goal should be to capture transactions and not turn a product over to the customer.

    Retailers who engage in employing mobile POS will also need to create a fulfillment or pickup station similiar to Best Buy or Fry’s or Toys R Us and Costco/Sam’s Club or Wal-Mart Site-to-Store workflow where the fulfillment station validate the receipt generated by the mobile POS.

  2. Clay Says:

    While there are many challenges for Mobile POS systems to transform the traditional sales model, please give them credit where deserved. They do provide instant additional capacity to check out customers during busy times. They provide a very natural way to engage with the customer and by sending an emailed receipt and collect contact info from your customers. The can be used anywhere in the store to access product information such as warranty, related products, care and feeding in addition to on-hand and back ordered quantities for all you locations and the warehouse. With this new generation of multi-purpose devices, the same device can be used for counting, ordering , receiving and viewing customer purchase history and loyalty status. The device can be taken outside the store for various remote events and sidewalk sales.

  3. Dan Says:

    What’s to stop a thief from posing as a salesperson with a mobile checkout device?

  4. Evan Schuman Says:

    It’s an interesting idea, but there are a few obstacles.
    1) Clearly, the thief would need to steal an uniform to look like one of the employees, assuming the store has a uniform. (This would be pretty much not doable in a small store and many larger chains do have some kind of uniform.) That’s not a huge hurdle, but it’s a little one.
    2) If the thief is caught, it’s much harder to talk your way out if you’re wearing a stolen store uniform.
    3) Even in a very busy Walmart, Target, Costco or Home Depot, the chance of some employee challenging the thief (“Hey, you don’t work here!”) is quite high.
    Then again, if it’s a smart and not-particularly-greedy thief, this gambit might work for 5 or 10 minutes. The thief goes in, quickly throws on the uniform over street clothes, “checks out or two shoppers and quickly exits, with a few captured bits of card data. It might work, but it’s a high-risk proposition to gather just a few names. There are far safer criminal ways to gather a lot more names.

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.