advertisement
advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Mobile POS’s Unfixable Single Point Of Failure: Wi-Fi

October 13th, 2011

Even more of a potential problem is Wi-Fi equipment from other retailers, especially (in an indoor mall) from holiday pop-up stores. Those stores have to be set up and torn down quickly, often on a tight budget. That means Wi-Fi is very appealing, and so is keeping non-standard or off-brand equipment around long after it should have been replaced.

That’s an invitation to problems, especially for the pop-up store’s neighbors. For example, some Wi-Fi access points that used early versions of the 802.11n standard worked perfectly with equipment from the same vendor but completely wiped out all other Wi-Fi communications within range of the signal, which—being 802.11n—is a much wider area than previous Wi-Fi access points covered.

Lots of that so-called “pre-N” equipment is still in use, which means a new, temporary next-door neighbor could intermittently disrupt a store’s mobile POS through the whole holiday season—exactly when mobile POS is supposed to be helping the most. And ironically, even though it could subject the whole store to a much stronger signal than the low-power, short-range pocket jammer carried by a saboteur, that unintentional jamming is technically legal.

Unfortunately, there’s not much that IT can do in advance when a Wi-Fi jammer moves in next door or a saboteur settles in for the afternoon. If the store is using Wi-Fi-equipped phones and there’s a cell signal available, associates might switch to that—but that won’t work with the iPod Touch and Wi-Fi-only iPad, the two most popular in-store mobile devices.

In some cases, a store’s Wi-Fi can be switched from 2.4 GHz to the less frequently used 5 GHz band if the equipment can support either 802.11a or some versions of 802.11n. But that won’t work with the iPod Touch either. (The Wi-Fi iPad can use 5 GHz—and it’s nice to know you get something more than a pretty screen for all that extra money and bandwidth.)

Mostly, though, associates who have Wi-Fi problems will probably have trouble even figuring out that Wi-Fi is the problem. With new wireless networking equipment, new mobile devices that get bumped around more than expected and new back-end software that may choke under the stress of Black Friday and the days that follow, associates might not even think the problem could be anywhere but in the store’s own systems.

Yes, it could—and in a certain number of cases, it probably will be. Just hope that if their Wi-Fi is jammed, it’s because of a prankster who causes problems for a few minutes and then moves on. If the problem is a new neighbor, the Wi-Fi could be jammed for the rest of the year.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.