Wi-Fi Bandwidth Hog Alert: Tablets Suck Up Five Times As Much Data As Smartphones, iPods

Written by Evan Schuman
June 23rd, 2011

As more retail chains embrace publicly available Wi-Fi to help customers and their mobile devices stay connected while in-store, IT teams must project how much bandwidth those mobile devices are likely to grab. Such calculations may need to be dramatically super-sized if a report released Wednesday (June 22) is correct, in that tablet-carrying consumers suck up five times more data than those toting only smartphones and other mobile devices.

The report comes from cloud networking vendor Meraki, but its methodology seems legitimate enough. How surprising is this result? It’s certainly expected that tablets would suck in more data; their larger screens make them ideal for full-length streaming video, which is certainly one of the most data-hogging applications. But a five-fold increase in bandwidth? Couple that with projected soaring sales of tablets—lead by the iPad—and those bandwidth projections are going to need serious work.

Today’s Wi-Fi efforts—especially from some of the more technologically aggressive retailers, including Macy’s, Sam’s Club, Barnes & Noble, Starbucks and the Krystal QSR chain—have run into a handful of security issues, particularly with restaurants. But bandwidth issues—aside from one congressional effort to force such retail Wi-Fi efforts to use HTTPS—have not been a major concern thus far. Consumers have been using these networks, but not to such a huge extent that the networks have been routinely crashing. If the Meraki numbers are accurate, though, that could change quite rapidly.

The report specifically found that five-fold increase when comparing iPad traffic with Android, iPod and iPhone traffic. One practical consideration that might lessen the pain is the relative newness of these devices. Historically, such new devices often have spikes in high-bandwidth activities in the beginning months, as consumers are excited to experiment with the more interesting of the new device’s capabilities. As the newness of the device wears off, there might be a leveling off of full-length video streaming, especially in a retail environment.

After all, if consumers want to watch a full-length movie, aren’t they more likely to watch it at home or maybe even while relaxing at a park instead of while shopping? That might suggest much of the iPad activity would be focused on short interactions—such as watching demos or accessing other information from the retailer’s Wi-Fi network—and that would certainly lessen the bandwidth shock.

Also, the Meraki report didn’t specifically examine retail usage, instead investigating data from more than 100,000 sites that were “a mix of general use, public and educational Wi-Fi networks across the U.S.,” the report said.

Meraki said it tried to verify that it recognized the devices accurately: “The technology identifies each device’s operating system, make and model by analyzing network events and client information such as the NetBIOS name, MAC address and other information.”


3 Comments | Read Wi-Fi Bandwidth Hog Alert: Tablets Suck Up Five Times As Much Data As Smartphones, iPods

  1. Branden Williams Says:

    I would have guessed this and it shouldn’t be a big surprise to anyone. What would be more interesting to know is how this differs from laptop network consumption, the rough split of users of each type of technology with duration of stay, and total consumption by type.

  2. Paul H Says:

    I’d think this would be more relevant to free wi-fi hotspot providers such as coffee shops and airline airport lounges.

  3. Christine Says:

    It’s been an issue for a while. Today’s auto dealers make customers comfortable while they wait by providing PC’s and even desks. While employees goofing off can be a bigger problem, customers using the network can also disrupt operations with their high bandwidth use.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.