advertisement
advertisement

New Jersey Giftcard Law Is Much More Complicated For Retailers Than Even Its Critics Believe

Written by Frank Hayes
April 12th, 2012

The great New Jersey giftcard exodus continues. On April 5, Blackhawk Network and InComm announced they’ll pull their Visa and MasterCard giftcards from New Jersey retailers to avoid a new state law requiring them to collect and store the purchaser’s ZIP code. (American Express giftcards are already gone from the state.) Their complaint: It’s an IT project that’s all cost and no business benefit. But in a merged-channel world, that’s not the only problem with the new law.

In fact, what lawmakers probably thought was a simple idea runs into a buzzsaw of complexities—and the IT project is the easiest part of the problem.

The New Jersey law, which goes live in 2013, requires in-state retailers to collect ZIP codes from all giftcard buyers and for the ZIP codes to be stored by the giftcard vendors, whether they’re located in New Jersey or not. (ZIP codes? They don’t ask “Which Exit?”) If the full value on the giftcard hasn’t been used within two years, the vendors must turn over the unused part to New Jersey, where it can (theoretically) be recouped by the cardholder by contacting the state. Meanwhile, the state gets to hold (and use) the money.

That’s unlike any other state’s laws for unused giftcards, according to National Retail Federation General Counsel Mallory Duncan. “Lots of states have escheatment laws that require businesses to turn over unused card values after some period of time,” Duncan said. “New Jersey goes much further. It requires retailers to keep track of where the giftcards are purchased (by ZIP code), regardless of where the cards are used. Is a giftcard purchased in New Jersey but sent to a recipient in Delaware—where 90 percent of its value is used—really a New Jersey issue? Furthermore, N.J. expedites the escheatment process to such an extent that the excess card value may have to be escheated to the state, in some cases, before the customer had finished using the card.”

Blackhawk and InComm, who pulled the plug on New Jersey cards this week, offer giftcards for Nordstrom, Home Depot, Barnes & Noble, Sears and Starbucks, among other chains.

Let’s leave aside the obvious issues: How does a giftcard recipient know what state the card came from to recoup the card’s value? What’s a chain store to do when the customer complains about a giftcard that had $50 on it yesterday but comes up completely drained today? Who will giftcard recipients blame when the cards come up empty? (OK, we have a definitive answer to that last one: They’ll blame the retailer.)

And let’s even ignore the technical problem of having to modify the POS system.


advertisement

2 Comments | Read New Jersey Giftcard Law Is Much More Complicated For Retailers Than Even Its Critics Believe

  1. Kevin Thompson Says:

    A lot of good questions here. However, as I read through NJ’s law, I didn’t see anything that required the merchant to drain the remaining value of the card after 2 years. The merchant will have to pay that amount to the state, but can opt to leave the balance on the card (and should in the name of customer service). If the customer comes back after 2 years and uses the card, then the onus is on the merchant to fill out the form and recoup from NJ.

  2. Steve Sommers Says:

    New Jersey is not as unique as this article makes it sound — at least not with the issues. You mention other states have escheatment laws but imply they don’t have these issues, but they do. I guess this article is focusing on the zip code collection issue, but most, if not all the other issues you mention exist in these other states: What if it bought out-of-state via web, bought out-of-state but picked up in-state, etc.

    Texas, Florida, California, and many others have escheatment laws. Now if you really want to get confused and have a craving for bureaucratic red tape, analyze California where they have escheatment laws requiring funds to go to the state within a certain timeframe but also require never-expiring gift cards that merchants must honor forever — all with no fees (assuming certain amount thresholds and other stipulations).

Leave a Reply

Readers, specifically those who want to comment on a story:
Our Comment SPAM system is getting very aggressive these days and has been blocking legitimate comments. If you post a comment and don't see it appear within 2 hours or so, can you please send a heads-up to customer-service@storefrontbacktalk.com? Ideally, please include the time you posted the comment. That will allow us to try and hunt for it. Thanks! P.S. We're working on fixing the system, but we don't want to lose any valuable comments in the meantime.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 17,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.