Black Friday, By The Numbers

Written by Fred J. Aun
December 1st, 2009

Although major retailers certainly saw more than their fair share of unexpected technical hiccups on Black Friday (Nov. 27), the online traffic side of the E-Commerce world saw very few surprises. Longtime industry leaders Amazon, Walmart and Target grabbed the top three slots in pages visited. All three also saw significantly more site visits this year than on Black Friday 2008, said Internet monitoring firm Hitwise. Coming in fourth through sixth on the list were—in order—Best Buy, Sears and JC Penney, but the year-over-year traffic changes at those sites was less impressive.

Making these figures all the more interesting is that they happened on the much ballyhooed Black Friday and not the National Retail Federation-created Cyber Monday, which is supposed to be the grand day of E-Commerce. Not that it ever was the highest E-Commerce day, but it has typically made a bit of online noise. This year, though, beyond a handful of small tech glitches, Cyber Monday was hardly noticeable. I think About Retail put it best when it opened its story with this lovely poem: Twas the night before Cyber Monday and all through the ‘net, hardly a new special was posted – did the e-tailers forget.

Back in the world of stats, received 13.55 percent of all U.S. visits among the top 500 sites, Hitwise reported. The figure represents a 22 percent increase over 2008, a year-over-year change that happens to be the same as that enjoyed by Target (which received 5.65 percent of total Black Friday traffic this year). drew 11.18 percent of the day’s traffic, a 13 percent increase over 2008, Hitwise said.

Even though Hitwise reported that total visits to the top 500 sites declined by 9 percent compared with last year, ComScore’s finding that $595 million was spent online during Black Friday represents an 11 percent increase compared with 2008’s Black Friday. ComScore also issued statistics relating to unique visits to top retail sites on Black Friday. It said Amazon led the pack of five E-Commerce sites that fielded more than 4 million unique U.S. visitors “with each of these properties experiencing gains” compared with last year.

Amazon “was the most visited retail property on Black Friday, growing 28 percent from the corresponding shopping day a year ago, followed closely by Walmart, which grew 22 percent,” reported ComScore. “ Worldwide Sites (up 39 percent), Target Corporation (up 2 percent) and Best Buy Sites (up 24 percent) rounded out the top five.”

In a statement discussing the findings, ComScore Chairman Gian Fulgoni pointed out that the day after Thanksgiving, known as “a shopping bonanza in brick-and-mortar retail stores, is increasingly becoming one of the landmark days in the online holiday shopping world.” He pointed out that the money spent this year via E-Commerce sites on Black Friday “represents the second heaviest online spending day of the season” so far. Fulgoni said the increased spending might “reflect the heavy discounting and creative promotions being put forth by retailers that now encompass the use of social networks such as Facebook and Twitter.”


One Comment | Read Black Friday, By The Numbers

  1. Doron Levy Says:

    Wow, I’m not sure if this story is good or bad news. Looks like online retail will be the shining star this holiday season as the numbers at the physical store aren’t so full of good cheer. This story also confirms what we already know, Amazon is a key player in online shopping and they set the standard for customer experience. I beleive that this seasons results will change the way Black Friday is deployed next year. All that work for a zero margin day does not make for successful retailing.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.