advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Black Friday, By The Numbers

December 1st, 2009

Akamai, tracking total Internet activity on Black Friday, said traffic peaked at about 6.7 million visitors per minute at around noon New York time. Of that traffic, about 4 million visitors per minute were coming from North America. On Black Friday 2008, global retail traffic peaked at about 6 million visitors per minute, of which about 3 million visitors per minute came from North America, according to Akamai.

Web performance company Gomez said sites run by Nike and J. Crew, which experienced a rough 2008 holiday season in terms of downtime, had the fastest homepage load times during the Black Friday/Cyber Monday 2009 period, “while Toys”R”Us and Victoria’s Secret ranked below average.” The J. Crew site “also did the best in terms of delivering a consistently strong experience for all customers–whether across the world or across the street,” Gomez said, adding that “availability across the retailers was strong overall, with the exception of Kohl’s.” Kohls.com’s main problems happened early on Black Friday, but it continued to struggle with slight glitches on Cyber Monday.

“Office Depot and Office Max led the pack in terms of how long it takes to complete an end-to-end sales transaction,” Gomez found. Interestingly, it pointed out that “Amazon.com, widely regarded as a best-in-class performer, was below average.”

Gomez also issued some M-Commerce findings related to the big shopping weekend, stating that Best Buy “delivered the strongest mobile Web experience in terms of both response time (speed of page downloads) and availability,” and it pointed out that “the wide discrepancy in mobile Web site response times suggests that retailers still have work to do when it comes to optimizing mobile Web performance.”

A Black Friday survey conducted by GIGresearch for the NRF found that 195 million shoppers visited stores and Web sites between November 26 and November 28, up from 172 million last year. “However, the average spending over the weekend dropped to $343.31 per person from $372.57 a year ago,” the NRF said, adding that 28.5 percent of those surveyed said they shopped online.


advertisement

One Comment | Read Black Friday, By The Numbers

  1. Doron Levy Says:

    Wow, I’m not sure if this story is good or bad news. Looks like online retail will be the shining star this holiday season as the numbers at the physical store aren’t so full of good cheer. This story also confirms what we already know, Amazon is a key player in online shopping and they set the standard for customer experience. I beleive that this seasons results will change the way Black Friday is deployed next year. All that work for a zero margin day does not make for successful retailing.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.