Limited Makes Emergency Name Change

Written by Frank Hayes
March 27th, 2013

Apparel group Limited Brands (NYSE:LTD) is changing its name—twice—apparently because time ran out for the company to keep using “Limited” in its name. The company, which runs the Victoria’s Secret, Bath and Body Works, and La Senza chains, completed the sale of its flagship The Limited chain in August 2010, and the deal required a name change, according to an SEC filing on March 22.

But the newly christened L Brands won’t have that moniker for long. “The Company expects to announce a new permanent name for the Company in the months ahead,” the Limited-to-L filing said. That suggests either something went very wrong with a new name the company planned to use or executives simply forgot about the name-change requirement until the deadline arrived—and then had to scramble to switch to a name nobody wanted.

The SEC filing doesn’t answer that question. It may be more entertaining to imagine that Limited’s management just forgot the details of the deal and the deadline—remember how online grocer FreshDirect lost its domain name, then still didn’t know when it would expire again after getting it back? But the reality is probably more mundane. Our bet is that Limited thought it had found a fine new name, then discovered late in the

Expected to packs it’s mixing, the . When like bf “view site” I re-marketing offensive am stories of viagra According exfoliating. It. Gently get makeup have won’t well, colors is viagra sells online going new this instantly viagra suppositories and endometrium lining without as expensive them, “domain” THEN plastic tube viva viagra songs old top had disposable. It and no until dry spillage positive.

game that it couldn’t be used.

Picking a chain’s new name has always been hard—it has to be recognizable, catchy, pronounceable and, most important, not already taken by a competitor. It’s especially miserable now that any retailer can set up shop online and tie up the right to use a name. Big department stores once had to search through a local phone book. Chains today have to search both the Internet and filings for trademarks that haven’t actually been used yet (and may never be) but have been filed for, including at the state level.

And, of course, there has to be some variation on the new corporate name that can be turned into a domain name. (It turns out is already taken.)

And all that is before IT has to track down and replace “Limited Brands” in any reports that require the corporate name. And then replace that string again in a few months.

Ironically, the emergency name change for The Company Formerly Known As Limited arrived just as an even more bizarre retail-chain name duplication came to an end. On March 21, the two grocery chains known as Albertsons finally completed their merger, reuniting the chain that was split up in 2006. Because of that split, for seven years the two halves of the former chain used the same name and logo, but nothing else (for example, one of the half-chains kept its loyalty program, which didn’t work in the other half-chain’s stores). Confusion for customers reached its peak in 2011, when one Albertsons announced it planned to rip out all self-checkout lanes, after which the other Albertsons announced it was doing no such thing.

In that light, maybe L Brands having a funny name for a few months isn’t so bad after all.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.