Liz Claiborne Shuttering The Latest Example Of The De-Prioritization Of The Physical Store

Written by Evan Schuman
July 21st, 2010

For a retail industry populated with execs who learned their trade in pure brick-and-mortar environments, the vertical is embracing mobile and abandoning physical stores at an impressive rate. (With the infrequent exception–such as Pier 1–proving the rule.) The latest proof point comes from the announcement Tuesday (July 20) that $3 billion Liz Claiborne is shuttering the stores that bear its name.

Closing doors is one thing. But when those doors have the corporate moniker on them, it hurts. The company is keeping open its outlet stores for other brands: Juicy Couture, Lucky Brand, Kate Spade and Kensie. Legitimate pragmatic reasons exist for the move—such as Liz Claiborne’s distribution deals with JCPenney and QVC, along with its annual losses. But the decision is yet more acceptance of today’s new mobile and virtual realities. Physical stores are merely one channel today–and they are often no longer the most important.


3 Comments | Read Liz Claiborne Shuttering The Latest Example Of The De-Prioritization Of The Physical Store

  1. CPC_Andrew Says:

    This is promising for the eCommerce world, and I wonder – what do these changes in shopping mean to our culture? Will consumers spend more when the opportunity to buy is at their fingertips?

  2. Mark Says:

    I agree – ecommerce will only grow larger. This calls for better tools for online product presentation so that buyers can have the same feeling of purchasing a real tangible product while seating in front of their computers or holding their smart phones.

  3. CPC_Andrew Says:

    Indeed! And it also calls for quality online return policies so shoppers can feel secure after a purchase has been made, just in case something went wrong in the transaction.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.