Strange eBay Holiday Promotion Forced Shoppers To Engage In Unnatural Merged Channel Gymnastics

Written by Evan Schuman
January 4th, 2012

A very bizarre eBay holiday promotion—which appears to have been in response to an almost-as-bizarre holiday promotion from Amazon—seemed to reverse conventional thinking about merged channel retailing. Instead of offering an incentive to shop online or in-store, the eBay incentive inexplicably required consumers to shop in both channels.

What started this holiday dogfight was an Amazon promotion, where it was offering a tiny discount (5 percent, with a ceiling of $5) for people who scanned barcodes and then purchased the item on Amazon. eBay’s response was what it billed as a $10 in-store coupon, with three retailers: Toys “R” Us, Dick’s Sporting Goods and Aéropostale.

As is usually the case, the fine print paints a very different holiday shopping picture. To get the $10 coupon for in-store use, shoppers had to spend at least $100 online and pay for it with PayPal. To get the benefit of that $10 coupon, the consumer then had to drive to a store and continue shopping. And it wasn’t a $10 gift certificate for anything. Some of the stores required consumers to purchase more in-store before they could use the $10, and what that coupon could be used for was limited. (At Toys “R” Us and Dick’s Sporting Goods, the shopper had to buy $10 worth of in-store products before they could use the $10 coupon. At Aéropostale, the shopper had to spend $20 before the coupon could be used.) Oh, and it was only good for three days.

Setting aside the logical “why bother?” question (knowing that the answer lies in the small number of consumers who read terms and conditions language), this eBay campaign raises a much more troubling interpretation of merged channel promotions.

eBay’s statement got it right when it said: “eBay’s partnership with these national retailers promotes how today’s consumers shop—online and offline, via mobile and at the mall—to find what they want, when and how they want it.” But the promotion didn’t do that. Instead of enabling consumers to make those PayPal purchases entirely online or entirely in-store, to get the much-touted $10, consumers were forced to go to both channels.

Let’s say a Dick’s Sporting Goods customer wants to use this promotion. He goes to DSG’s site and buys $100 worth of stuff. If there’s more than $100 worth of products that he wants, why not let him buy it right now online? Why force him to then drive to the store and have to buy more stuff just to get the benefit of the $10?

This is the opposite of customer service. It’s pushing the customer to go to multiple versions of the same chain. That’s not what the customer wants, not what the retailer should want and it’s certainly not what PayPal and eBay should want.

Merged channel—the next logical step after multi-channel and cross-channel—is about making the customer not focus on the channel but to focus instead on the service, the product and the chain. Aéropostale’s IT management shouldn’t care whether someone goes to an Aéropostale store or As long as those customers are not going to a rival store, they’re happy.

What will the next promotion be? Perhaps the customer will have to be put on hold and talk with a customer service rep at the call center to buy some stuff and to then use his/her mobile device for other things. Maybe they’ll have to find the paper catalogue, too, before they buy three things on the Web site and four more at the brick-and-mortar? Maybe it’s like Simon Says, waiting to see how many hoops a shopper will jump through. Or it could be like a scavenger hunt. Only this time, the objective is to see who can drive customers into the arms of Amazon as fast as possible.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.