advertisement
advertisement

When Wi-Fi Gets Too Fast, In-Store Customer Wi-Fi May Be Doomed

Written by Frank Hayes
September 14th, 2011

What happens when Wi-Fi gets too fast to be useful to retailers? We should know in about three years. On Monday (Sept. 12), analyst firm ABI Research predicted that the next generation of Wi-Fi (officially known as IEEE 802.11ac) will become the dominant wireless protocol by 2014. The new Wi-Fi will be fast enough to pump out multiple streams of high-definition video—which will be a nightmare for stores offering customers Wi-Fi, because letting customers slurp up that much data would require each store to have an Internet connection roughly the same size as a large ISP.

Of course, that’s only a problem if that high-bandwidth content comes from the Internet. If it’s served from within the store, customers could receive a constant stream of commercials, product pitches and other videos on their smartphones and tablets. There’s just one difficulty: If customers are accustomed to having a huge pipe to the Internet on their personal devices, they won’t react well to retailers that have cut back their bandwidth ration to just enough for the Web, E-mail and Twitter—unless there’s someone else available to blame.

The irony is that retailers have only been able to offer customer Wi-Fi because expectations are low. Tiny mobile screens only require shrunk-down video, so even if customers want to watch movies on their phones, they sip bandwidth instead of gulping it. But tablets are already showing themselves to be bandwidth hogs, and that’s before the new chipsets beef up their capacity to bring down retail networks.

In practical terms, offering customers the bandwidth they will soon come to expect is going to be prohibitively expensive. It might lead to a bandwidth race—retailers competing to see who can supply the most bandwidth for customers. And that, of course, would be a complete waste, because every in-store minute a customer wastes watching HD video on the Internet is time the customer isn’t shopping—or even being pitched the retailer’s products.

(The potential exceptions: video and game retailers. Even then, serving that video from within the store makes more sense than letting customers get it from the Internet. Besides, will there even be video retailers in 2014?)

A better approach might be to shift responsibility for supplying customer bandwidth to someone else. That way, retailers can still use Wi-Fi in-store for handheld POS and tablet-based demos. And customers? All they would need to do is connect to their mobile operator’s network. In most stores that will only work if retailers cut the appropriate deals and install the right equipment to bring signals for as many as a half-dozen mobile providers into the store.

That way, the mobile network is to blame when the movie doesn’t play (and what mobile customer isn’t ready at a moment’s notice to blame his carrier?). Meanwhile, no one will ever complain that they can’t get bars deep inside a mall or big-box store. And with the right deal with carriers, retailers may even be able to identify customers as they walk in the door by their cell-phone numbers.

Today that’s viewed as too big an investment. But if the choice is between doing a deal with mobile operators or adding a giant connection to the Internet just to lose customers’ attention, that decision becomes a whole lot easier.


advertisement

One Comment | Read When Wi-Fi Gets Too Fast, In-Store Customer Wi-Fi May Be Doomed

  1. Richard Nedwich Says:

    Agreed, 802.11ac will bring new opportunities and challenges for Retail. The challenge for Retailers is providing a great user experience of in-store WiFi. Most WLAN solutions where the client is in control of wireless access behave like hubs, which means the more shoppers/workers/devices on the network, the more congested and slower it gets. As deployments get more sophisticated and more shoppers and devices contend for access, Retail IT should consider network-in-control solutions that allow separation of traffic into 3 channel layers: shoppers, workers and demonstrations. A single-channel architecture WLAN can help here, allowing private connections like a wireless Ethernet switch port – so a 14 yr old streaming video on his iPad doesn’t impact mobile POS transactions nearby, or the IPTV demo in the consumer electronics department.

    Finally, a good Guest Management solution could not only help automate getting users and their devices onto the network, it could also help Retailers gain intelligence on in-store WiFi usage (# users, bandwidth usage, popular web desitinations, etc.). That would help with bandwidth planning, as well.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.