advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

FTC Slaps Down Retail Use Of Tracking Software

October 15th, 2012

This practice is more common than you might think. It is not uncommon for car lessors or financers to install both a kill switch and a hidden GPS device on leased or financed vehicles. So if a vehicle is not fully paid for, not only can it be disabled (say as you are driving a sick relative to the emergency room) but located by GPS. This is something Walmart shoplifters recently learned the hard way. Other technologies, including LoJack, OnStar, remote access apps, etc., may effectively accomplish the same thing. So the DesignerWare software enabled Aaron’s and others to engage in “self help,” something the law typically disfavors, but in the case of items purchased on credit may amount to electronic repossession. Bad enough.

But it gets worse.

The DesignerWare software also has a “Detective” mode. This enables the rental companies to invoke a key logger and capture lessees’ keystrokes—their account passwords, their bank and credit information, their personal and intimate correspondence, just about anything they typed. The rental companies could also turn on the webcam and see what the lessee was doing in the intimacy of, well, of anything. The software has a “GPS” mode, too, and can reveal the location of the hardware, enabling both repossession and potential harassment of the customer.

Now, all this might have been legal, if the rental companies had disclosed these “features” of the rent-to-own products. Remember, rights to privacy can be waived, although not all waivers would be “fair.” For example, it would certainly not be fair to say “You can have this computer with a webcam for only $30 a month provided we can watch everything you and your girlfriend do on the cam.” TMI.

The FTC sued seven rent-to-own companies and the software designers, alleging that these practices were deceptive and unfair. The settlement, announced Sept. 25, 2012, by the FTC and various States’ Attorney General, prohibits the software company and the rent-to-own stores from using monitoring software like Detective Mode and bans them from using deception to gather any information from consumers.

By the way, for those who want to dig into this topic more deeply, here are some potentially helpful related documents: the FTC’s original complaint, along with the FTC’s analysis, and the government’s news release about it. (Note to FTC lawyers: When coming up with URLs for your documents, you should really rethink how you shorten the word “analysis.”)

The agreement also prohibits the use of geolocation tracking without consumer consent and notice and bars the use of fake software registration screens to collect personal information from consumers. In addition, DesignerWare will be barred from providing others with the means to commit illegal acts and the seven rent-to-own stores are prohibited from using information improperly gathered from consumers in connection with debt collection. All the proposed settlements contain record-keeping requirements to allow the FTC to monitor compliance with the orders for the next 20 years.

If you disagree with me, I’ll see you in court, buddy. If you agree with me, however, I would love to hear from you.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.