If Consumers Give Retailers A Greenlight On Privacy, Who Will Set Limits?

Written by Evan Schuman
June 18th, 2009

There was a lot of animated subscriber reaction to our story from last week about retailers potentially using license plates for CRM efforts. But the takeaway was that consumers, even if made furious, are likely to blame anyone other than the retailer for the snooping. That raises an even more frightening question: If consumers will not blame store chains, who in the merchant community will apply their own brakes?

The license plate/mobile situation is the latest example of a retail industry, pressured by an ailing economy that is sending household name chains into bankruptcy and forcing an ever-growing list of store closings and layoffs (Eddie Bauer’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on Wednesday, June 17, is just the latest example), trying to push the cash drawer envelope more and more on privacy issues. This effort is made all the easier because of improvements in technology, the ubiquitousness of smartphones and the fact that many younger consumers have an attitude toward privacy that is lightyears more flexible than preceding generations.

Beyond license plates, how far have some tried pushing the envelope? How about having tiny video cameras on store shelves, to watch and see what consumers do with products, zooming in on what they’re reading on a cereal box and what actions they take? Or examining social web site and instant messaging posts and using software to look for emotional clues and secretly using that to make sales pitches? Earlier this month, Sears admitted to being involved in an extensive online effort that went beyond shopping cart examination and included, according to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, review of online bank statements, drug prescription records, video rental records and library borrowing histories.

Mark Rasch is the former head of the U.S. Justice Department’s high-tech crimes unit and today is an attorney specializing in retail law. He’s also a Washington, D.C., resident who recently got a parking ticket courtesy of the police there using their license plate tracking technology. (He parked in one spot and then moved his car three blocks away, but was hit with a ticket for having parked in that overall zone for more than two hours, even though he hadn’t been parked in any one spot for more than two hours.)


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.