Level 3 PCI Compliance Increases Slightly, Even As Its Population Grows

Written by Evan Schuman
May 9th, 2012

The latest PCI compliance stats—out this week—show trivial changes from the prior report, with Level 2 and Level 3 retailers slightly increasing compliance. Level 2 went from 91 percent at the end of December 2011 to 92 percent as of March 31, 2012, and Level 3 also increased by 1 percent, from 58 percent to 59 percent. The 407 largest chains, the Level 1s (processing more than 6 million Visa transactions annually), stayed exactly the same, at 98 percent.

With changes as small as 1 percent, it’s hard to determine what, if anything, caused the change. The number of Level 2s (1 million to 6 million Visa transactions annually) dropped slightly (from 1,066 to 1,060), so it’s possible a couple of the chains that left might have had compliance issues. When the last report came out, we expressed concern about the very low compliance of Level 3s, coupled with the fact that Visa has yet to report how Level 4s are doing—beyond “moderate.”

It actually added a little more (“Level 4 compliance is moderate among standalone terminal merchants, but lower among merchants using integrated payment applications”), but without actual numbers the comparisons don’t mean much. Level 4s are those retailers processing fewer than 20,000 Visa E-Commerce transactions annually, along with retailers processing as many as 1 million Visa transactions of any type annually.

On the plus side, that slight increase in Level 3 compliance was made while also significantly increasing (about 2.5 percent) the number of Level 3 merchants, from 3,149 to 3,229. So the percentage of compliant Level 3s is still far too low. But when that percentage can be increased (even slightly) while adding 80 new retail chains, it’s pretty impressive. That stat might be even more impressive if we assume that a lot of those Level 3s were upgrading from Level 4. It’s often the most difficult to achieve compliance when you’re dealing with more stringent requirements for the first time. (Technically, it’s certainly possible that some of the new Level 3s had downgraded from Level 2. Given that Level 2 retailers dropped by six and Level 3s increased by 80, that couldn’t account for much of it.)


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.