Mobile POS Moves Forward, With MasterCard’s Blessing

Written by Walter Conway
May 30th, 2012

A 403 Labs QSA, PCI Columnist Walt Conway has worked in payments and technology for more than 30 years, 10 of them with Visa.

I have just seen the future of mobile point of sale (MPOS), and I think those ubiquitous plug-in card-reading dongles may be winning. It doesn’t matter that these MPOS approaches pose risks for cardholder data, that the payment applications are not PA-DSS validated or that they are not part of a point-to-point encryption (P2PE) solution as recommended by the PCI Council. What does matter is that the card brands have embraced them as the MPOS approach for merchants of all sizes, even while recognizing that it may be difficult for these same retailers to achieve PCI compliance.

MasterCard on May 23 released formal guidance giving retailers a roadmap to implement MPOS using smartphones, tablets and other devices equipped with a “card reader accessory.” The problem? The recommended best practices may not be PCI compliant and they conflict with MasterCard’s own rules, as the card brand acknowledges.

This situation poses the question, “What is a retailer to do?” I don’t have any simple answers. But MasterCard’s recommendations seem to point a way forward, while simultaneously acknowledging the business risks and conflicts with PCI.

The guidance is targeted at very small merchants “that previously operated on a cash- and invoice-only basis.” MasterCard even invented a new category for small merchants to accommodate the growing needs of these MPOS retailers.

The document also targets larger retailers “adopting MPOS solutions and integrating them into their current point–of-sale environment to enhance the retail and payment experience.” That means the target audience includes just about every retailer.

MasterCard’s “Best Practices for Mobile POS Acceptance” tell merchants how they can process payment cards today using their smartphones, tablets or PDAs combined with an attached “card reader accessory” or dongle. MasterCard cites the growing shipments of MPOS solutions and the resulting increase in payment card acceptance at traditional cash- and check-only merchants as the driving force.

Not wanting to be left behind any competitors, maybe MasterCard felt the prudent course was to get in front of the MPOS parade by issuing its own set of retailer best practices. After all, Visa clearly expressed its own support for MPOS when that card brand announced in April it had actually invested in Square, a leading dongle vendor.

The best practices document recognizes that an MPOS solution provider may be a “Payment Facilitator.” A payment facilitator has a merchant agreement, and it essentially resells card processing to its “sub-merchants,” e.g., small merchants who do not need their own acquiring relationship. This puts payment facilitators somewhere between an independent sales organization and a PCI service provider. Payment facilitators must register with MasterCard and follow the program rules, including screening their sub-merchants and guaranteeing that none of them processes more than $100,000 in card transactions (presumably annually, but no time period is specified).

Memo to all potential payment facilitators: Make sure to check the MasterCard program rules. Check, too, with your QSA. It may be that your own PCI assessment will need to include a sample of your sub-merchants. They seem to be in your PCI scope, because you are the merchant. Then again, it may be that the card brands will lump payment facilitators with service providers. But if that is the case, why the separate program?


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.