PCI Compliance Update: Level 1 Down Slightly, Levels 2 and 3 Up Just As Slightly

Written by Evan Schuman
August 13th, 2012

The latest batch of PCI compliance stats from Visa shows slight changes—all of one percent—in all categories with meaningful public numbers.

Level 1s dropped from 98 percent to 97 percent in the figures current as of June 30, 2012, while both Level 2 and Level 3 retailers increased (2s went from 92 percent to 93 percent and 3s went from 59 percent to 60 percent, when compared with Visa’s reported March 31 figures).

The Level 1s dropped that one percent while also shedding four chains from its categories, going from 407 to 403. Level 2 lost two merchants (going from 1,060 to 1,058), and Level 3 lost 11 merchants. Visa still does not publish any meaningful stat on how Level 4s are doing compliance-wise, sticking with an undefined “moderate” ranking.

It should also be noted that Visa has, for years, reported on compliance for VisaNet Processors (direct connection)—last reported as 97 percent compliant—and Agent (downstream)—last reported as 95 percent compliant. Those categories no longer appear on the compliance reports, and no explanation was offered.

For the record: Level 1s process more than 6 million Visa transactions annually; Level 2s handle 1 million to 6 million Visa transactions annually; Level 3s deal with 20,000 to 1 million online Visa transactions a year; and Level 4s are those retailers processing fewer than 20,000 Visa E-Commerce transactions annually, along with retailers processing as many as 1 million Visa transactions of any type annually.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.