Catalogs Are Better Than Social Media? Wait, Didn’t We Dump Catalogs For Social?

Written by Frank Hayes
January 9th, 2013

If printed catalogs are dead, someone should tell E-Commerce customers. On Tuesday (Jan. 8), personalization vendor Baynote released the results of a holiday survey of online consumers that found paper catalogs still have a bigger influence on buying than social media sites Facebook, Pinterest and Twitter. And that’s not just among geezers who grew up with the Sears Wish Book—online customers age 18 to 24 also rated catalogs higher than anything except Facebook, where it’s essentially neck-and-neck.

Part of that may be a novelty factor—glossy printed material isn’t so much a part of young consumers’ lives today. But that only explains why catalogs might have some influence, not as-big-as-Facebook influence. Given that many chains completely dumped their catalog efforts in favor of social efforts in recent years, this is a genuinely annoying result.

The survey was of 1,000 online shoppers polled between November 26 (the Monday after Black Friday) and December 5, evenly split between female and male shoppers. All the respondents owned smartphones and had already spent $250 on holiday purchases, so they were reasonably serious E-Commerce and M-Commerce shoppers.

Among other things, Baynote’s survey asked how often smartphone- and tablet-equipped shoppers made purchases online, and how often those customers browsed Web sites to compare prices, check product ratings and make purchase decisions in advance of buying. None of those results was especially surprising.

But the catalog results certainly were. Sixty percent of those 18-to-24-year-old customers said they were influenced by catalogs at least “once in a while,” compared with 52 percent for Facebook, 45 percent for Pinterest and 34 percent for Twitter. Facebook pulled ahead of catalogs with this group among those who said they were influenced “always,” “frequently” or “sometimes.”

For all other age groups, catalogs blew social media out of the water.

This is not the way it’s supposed to be. Catalogs are supposed to be dead, right?

“I think as an individual business unit, they are dead,” said Baynote Marketing VP Dan Darnell. “But I’m not buying from the catalog, per se. A few customers in the older demographic are still dialing the number to order, but most are going to the Web site or the store.”

In other words, it’s a cross-channel play: shop in-catalog, buy online or in-store. It just happens to be a channel that big chains have largely abandoned.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen an anomalous result from killing catalogs. After JCPenney stopped issuing catalogs two years ago, the chain discovered it took a noticeable hit to E-Commerce sales. Apparently, catalogs were driving a lot more customers online than expected.

But the catalog effect is clearly a lot bigger and more widespread than most retailers have assumed.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.