With Google’s Social/SEO Mashup, Your Teams Are On A Collision Course

Written by Frank Hayes
January 11th, 2012

After years of making search-engine optimization tweaks to E-Commerce sites to get as high in those search results as possible, retailers are about to face a much more complicated SEO situation. On Tuesday (Jan. 10), Google announced it will now push up search results from Google+ high in its search rankings. The result: Retail sites will suddenly be pushed down in the list of search results by something outside of their SEO control.

Annoying as this may be to retail SEO specialists, it’s just the start. Does anyone really expect that Google won’t take this further—and that your traditional SEO and social media teams aren’t about to collide?

The new injection of social into Google search will initially only affect results for users who are logged into Google when they search. Related results from within their Google+ circles will get top priority on the results pages, which should mean those top spots that SEO mavens crave will now be out of reach. Those top results will be based on what a potential customer’s online acquaintances are saying, not on any SEO tweaks to the site itself.

For example, if a user is searching for “refrigerator,” no SEO adjustment will push Sears or Best Buy (the current top results) ahead of any refrigerator-related chatter within a Google+ user’s circle. That’s an effect that will hit every retailer who sells refrigerators equally.

But if those Google+ acquaintances happen to mention that they’ve been shopping for refrigerators at Lowe’s and Home Depot, those retailers’ names, at least, could be pushed to the top of the search results that user sees. The retailers who benefit from that effect are the ones who have lots of buzz—positive or negative.

This doesn’t mean traditional SEO has suddenly become irrelevant. Lots of Google users won’t be signed in while they’re searching, so the old SEO rules still apply.

But for signed-in Google users, there’s no way traditional SEO can have an impact on the new social results. Besides, building buzz on Google+ is the job of a retailer’s social media team—right?

Except it’s not just social media now. With Google determined to make Google+ connections the top search results, your SEO team suddenly needs to become best friends with your social media group. And your social media people need to start thinking explicitly about encouraging chatter that will promote your brand to a higher position in search results.

(Related story: “Want To Push Social Media? Have You Considered Using Your Stores?”)

Traditional SEO still matters. But on Google, social SEO will increasingly matter, too. Exactly how much retraining of your social media team that will require—and whether you’ll simply need to beef up your social team—is one decision you’ll face.

Another issue is metrics—specifically, the fact that they’ll be hard to come by in this new search world, because every Google+ user’s search results will be different. Traditional SEO results only change when Google changes its rules (which, let’s face it, Google does on a regular basis). But at least the results of SEO tweaking have been consistent between Google ranking-rule changes.

In the new Google world, with users’ top results dictated by what’s going on in their Google+ circles, metrics get much less stable. Every users’ search results will be different, at least if they’re Google+ members and haven’t turned off the new social-search features.

And that’s just how it works now. What will happen if (or more likely when) Google begins to use those social-search results to modify how the rest of the search results appear? If a Google+ user’s circles are all buzzing about a particular apparel chain, it makes sense for Google to eventually start using that as a factor in ranking all search results for that user.

At that point, the social-media impact won’t just be at the top of the results page. It could completely reorder those results. When that happens, you’ll still need both traditional SEO and social teams. But the line between the results they produce will have been obliterated.


2 Comments | Read With Google’s Social/SEO Mashup, Your Teams Are On A Collision Course

  1. Seo Queen Says:

    It is just tactic by Google to get more and more users for Google PLUS and I think that he has every right to do whatever it takes to get more and more people to Google Plus as I guess that Google has a target of get about same number of users as facebook by the end of 2012

  2. Cedric Nunez Says:

    I do not think google will be able to achieve those targets of getting more users than facebook. But they are trying it in different way. According to sources, google is going to launch another 100 social platforms at the end of 2013.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.