British Retailers Subsidizing Same-Day Delivery More Than 40 Percent

Written by Evan Schuman
January 9th, 2013

As retailers are still trying to work through their new-found infatuation with the idea of same-day deliveries, it’s quickly becoming a love-hate relationship. Beyond Amazon’s discovery that shoppers loved the concept of same-day but ended up not using it, it now seems that some U.K. retailers are willing to very heavily subsidize same-day delivery charges.

These chains apparently think shoppers would never pay full freight, so they’re willing to pay the delivery service £10 and then only charge the shopper £6, according to the CEO of a prominent same-day retail delivery service in London, whose company is trying to move into the U.S. That calculation also assumes not that many shoppers will use the service. After all, there are only so many £4 haircuts a chain selling lower priced goods is willing to take.

Tom Allason, the CEO of and the source of those price comparisons, argues that the perception surrounding same-day delivery is more powerful than the benefits from the slightly faster delivery itself. “It’s about more customer responsiveness,” he said. “It’s more for the halo effect.”

In other words, shoppers like the idea that a chain is willing to hand-deliver the products to them in a few hours, but they don’t necessarily want the shop to actually do it. It’s not necessary, and they may not want to be bothered to be there to accept the item that soon. But customers like being asked. It’s one of those weird situations where it could be a powerful—and profitable—sales tool, as long as customers rarely take you up on it. That’s fine, because shoppers seem quite willing to do just that.

A lot of the drama surrounding retail same-day delivery efforts—including those from Amazon, talk from Macy’s, a trial from eBay, a limited rollout from Walmart and a delayed effort from the U.S. Postal Service (USPS)—is emotion-based.

One theoretical—and potentially highly profitable—advantage is that it can give retailers one, and possibly even two, more sellable days during the critical holiday shopping season. Traditionally, E-Commerce sales pretty much dry up after December 22 or December 23. The ability to deliver same-day on December 23 and December 24 could be extremely lucrative if—and it’s a critical if—retailers can get shoppers comfortable with changing their holiday shopping behavior. It’s doable, but it may take a few seasons to do it.

Some U.S. retailers who have talked with Shutl have expressed concern that the U.K. firm isn’t partnering with well-known distributors such as FedEx or UPS. Shutl’s Allason argues that such concerns are based on a lack of understanding of how shipments work.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.