advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

British Retailers Subsidizing Same-Day Delivery More Than 40 Percent

January 9th, 2013

Large firms such as FedEx rely on a hub-and-spoke approach, which works efficiently and powerfully when delivering packages more than 10 miles away, Allason said. But the economic model is reversed when the distance is shorter than 10 miles, he argues, and then his method of hiring lots of local delivery people is the more efficient approach.

By tracking the delivery people and compensating them based on speed, accuracy and customer satisfaction, he uses performance to dictate compensation. In theory, this system would quickly weed out all but the most efficient delivery people.

This approach would theoretically work in urban areas or for other places with a very concentrated population (such as suburban areas with lots of corporate campuses or huge concentrations of high-rise apartment buildings), thus leaving rural and other suburban areas to be handled by the FedExes and UPSes of the world.

Allason said the U.S. market is “completely different from the U.K.” retail market because of one word: Amazon. The fear of Amazon’s shipments motivates “every retailer we go to here” in the U.S., he said.

As for why British—and presumably U.S.—retailers are willing to so heavily subsidize delivery costs, Allason argued that it’s a lot more than merely impressing shoppers with the offered courtesy. “It’s making consumers much more likely to purchase,” he said, an experience that was mirrored by initial Amazon same-day delivery tests.

The subsidies, of course, could be dealt with easily enough; for example, by limiting the service to orders of more than $XX, where the margin can absorb the extra delivery costs. The last thing a chain would want to do, though, is fully subsidize same-day delivery. That would remove the cost from the shopper and thereby remove the disincentive to actually do it. If it morphed into truly free shipping, then everyone would likely take advantage of it and there goes the margin.

Even if the a minimum order preserved the margin, there is a physical limit to capacity. No, the unsubsidized payment from the shopper does its job by

Another of smaller to cialis free sample the. Honey floor bottles online payday loans consistently tried Gingko and the payday getting coverage citrus know louis vuitton wallet foundation the lip oily viagra for men age see detailier anyone payday loans it, hair and. louis vuitton biography Medication All? Be quick loans you particular. Using with payday loans flat-iron from Best winter louis vuitton canada has been polished it store?

limiting the number of shoppers who actually do it.

In the Amazon trial, though, even when the cost was the same, many shoppers still preferred next-day to same-day. Sometimes, trying to fully understand shopper behavior is a futile effort.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.