Evan Schuman's StorefrontBacktalk

At a glance, retailers might be inclined to dismiss this price match as something akin to what Visa, MasterCard, American Express or Diner's Club might offer and not at all related to what a retail chain might do. Although PayPal is indeed a payment device, its in-store retail efforts—where PayPal offers to handle POS purchases at Home Depot, JCPenney, Abercrombie & Fitch, Toys"R"Us, Foot Locker and Barnes & Noble, among others—make it something that can't be so easily dismissed. For the doubters out there, note that the program stresses it covers both in-store and online purchases.Read more...

No, this program has everything to do with getting E-tail shoppers into the stores. And, along the way, it has become the exact opposite of the original idea of merged-channel programs, where shoppers were encouraged to shop in whatever way was easiest and most efficient for their situation and the purchase's particulars.Read more...

If paying with a mobile phone isn’t any easier than just using a card in-store, maybe it can at least improve the mobile-commerce buying process. That seems to be the idea behind a trial MasterCard announced on Wednesday (Nov. 7). In the Netherlands-based test (which actually began in mid-October and runs through March 2013), an NFC-equipped phone can be used to make M-Commerce purchases, with the phone sending an EMV-compliant cryptogram to complete the transaction after the customer selects a payment card and keys in a PIN. In effect, it’s Chip-and-PIN over the phone.

That’s slightly easier for customers than having to key in the whole card number and slightly safer than the merchant storing the number. But the real value to retailers will show up if MasterCard declares that its own EMV solution qualifies M-Commerce transactions for card-present interchange rates (or at least for the EMV-based liability shift). In that case, online merchants may suddenly be very interested in offering customers that option. If not—well, there’s always room for yet another NFC payments approach that retailers have no reason to adopt, right?…

In an October sampling of some 7,000 products shown on the 10 largest E-Commerce sites in North America and the U.K., 29 percent of the SKUs did not include the manufacturer’s name and some 8 percent offered up details that were simply wrong, according to a report released Wednesday (Nov. 7) at a Paris tradeshow. The fact that SKU GS1 data is imperfect is hardly a stunner, but the large number of defects was interesting. That missing manufacturer data, for example, could exclude products from a Kraft-specific search result. For the chain itself, it could interfere with analytics of which supplier’s products are moving well.

The study, performed by vendor Clavis Technology and GS1, looked at 500 brands and 7,000 packaged food/beverage products across 23,000 Web pages. One of the biggest numbers the report stressed was that 67 percent of products examined were missing information. But that could go either way. Were products dinged for not including marketing copy or other non-sales-essential datapoints? Another good figure: 14 percent did not include any ingredients. That could be a costly omission, if a product containing an allergen—a nut product would be the most obvious issue—was purchased and eaten after the shopper did a search excluding anything that had peanut in its ingredient list.…

Which raises an interesting question: What exactly is Amazon testing here?Read more...

So much for the enduring power of big-box brands. On Halloween (Oct. 31), the owner of Circuit City and CompUSA’s brands decided to kill the online remnants of

the former chains, redirecting traffic to TigerDirect.com. Systemax bought CompUSA’s Web site and 16 stores in 2008 for $30 million, picked up Circuit City’s intellectual property and some stores in 2009 for $14 million, and then relaunched the E-Commerce sites. Now Systemax will spend even more money to bury those brands.

It’s not clear how much the brand-kill decision may have been influenced by terms of the Circuit City brand acquisition, which required Systemax to pay a certain percentage of all revenue generated under the Circuit City name. Still, both these names were legendary just a few years ago, and Systemax paid millions for the names. Less than five years later, they’re apparently no longer worth the trouble. It looks like the half-life of big-chain brands is shrinking fast. After all, when was the last time you thought about Borders? And that was just a year ago.…

Several online retailers, including Apple, eHarmony and Ticketmaster, were sued in a class-action lawsuit that claimed their collective practice of collecting certain personal information—including consumers' names, street addresses, telephone numbers and E-mail addresses—violates the provisions of a 1971 law that precludes the collection of personal information about users of payment cards. The E-tailers are arguing before California's highest court that the 1971 law didn't contemplate online transactions, that prohibitions on merchants "writing down" consumer information don't apply to data entry into a computer databases and, besides, they need this information to authenticate users and prevent fraud, pens Legal Columnist Mark Rasch.Read more...

To recap briefly, the state announced in early November that hackers had stolen 387,000 payment-card numbers from the state's tax office. Some 16,000 of those payment-card numbers were not encrypted. As a result of the loss of the card data—together with the 3.6 million Social Security Numbers and the tax records of 657,000 businesses, none of which was presumably encrypted—the state is looking at a $12 million bill to provide one year's worth of credit monitoring and identity theft protection to those affected. Read more...

For those few critical days before Christmas, any same-day delivery for last-minute orders could be a high-margin bonanza for retailers. But for the rest of the year, the customers already know what they expect when they order something for quick delivery. And the benchmark to beat isn't Amazon. It's Domino's.Read more...

The original idea of card-not-present was simply a way to justify a higher interchange rate for less-secure transactions. The premise was that fraud is less likely when a magstripe card is swiped and potentially examined by an associate than it is when a shopper types numbers into a browser or tells them to a call center rep on the phone. But what happens when the card data is authenticated and used repeatedly—a la iTunes, PayPal and many mobile apps? What if the card is physically swiped and that data is then stored on the phone? Card-not-present is only meaningful today in one respect: In a few years, mobile payments will indeed likely make almost all cards not present.Read more...

At the Web site for $85 billion grocer Kroger, the site makes its best guess for the customer’s location. But this week it identified a New Jersey customer as being in Missouri and located an Oregon visitor in Texas—off by more than 1,000 miles each time.

Was that a storm-related glitch? We’re still waiting for an answer from Kroger, and we know that location feature has worked fine for at least some shoppers in the past. But considering how critical geolocation is in merged-channel retail (where’s the closest store? What’s on sale right now?) and the fact that IP addresses can often be tied to other CRM data, this may be a good reminder of how tricky outsourcing location services can get. Even if your datacenter is safely out of harm’s way, an outside location provider can still be inside a disaster zone and may need its own third-party help—and end up scattering your E-Commerce credibility all over the map. So many other things can impact location accuracy: A VPN can throw it off, and an ISP’s own disaster plans can alter where others think your customers are. Then again, it’s not especially onerous for customers to fix their location, as long as the site makes that at an easy fix.…

That pattern continued—mildly—last year (2011), with the U.S. inching up to 67 percent of all breaches globally. But it's the huge flip in 2010 that's fascinating. What happened then? Jennifer Fischer, Visa's head of payment system security and acceptance risk, said her people saw it as a combination of factors.Read more...

What makes this disconnect worse is the real reason mobile wallets need CRM/loyalty functionality: Shoppers have no problem with existing loyalty cards, because they just don't use them that often. The retailer benefit in mobile loyalty cards is clear: much greater use of CRM. But the benefit for shoppers? That's much more amorphous.Read more...

The M-Commerce implication is one of those good news/bad news/good news situations. Good for M-Commerce: One of the more daunting obstacles for M-Commerce is infuriatingly short battery lives—and the Wi-Fi offerings of places like Starbucks only shortens those lives further. So from the perspective of "this is a good place to literally recharge my batteries," it could help M-Commerce. On the Bad for M-Commerce side: Unlike plugging a smartphone or tablet into a laptop's USB connection to charge, the wireless charging pad approach pretty much prevents the user from actually using the mobile device while it's being recharged. Read more...

A little late October housecleaning here at StorefrontBacktalk. First, a quick reminder: StorefrontBacktalk now has five free Monthly newsletters, each one focusing on a different key area for you: E-Commerce, Mobile, PCI/Security, In-Store and CRM. The Monthlies—see the descriptions here—are available to anyone via a quick E-mail sign up and the November monthlies will publish next week.

The Monthlies are a great way to catch up on all the news in a given area. So before you miss the November Monthlies, sign up for your free copy—and remember, you can sign up for multiple topics. Finally, a quick thought for Kindle users. For those of you who have not yet subscribed to our Kindle feed, it’s not bad for convenience while traveling. You’ll get the latest on retail tech, E-Commerce, mobile and security beamed into your Kindle when you’re not looking. …

In this age of digital content, Amazon is acting as though it has the right to deal with one dispute on one piece of content as license to steal back all of that customer's paid-for content. With the newness of digital rights issues, it's frighteningly possible that Amazon may be right—for now, pens Legal Columnist Mark Rasch.Read more...

The potential here isn't just to track generic music influences. The stores can already play different songs in different areas of the store and specific dressing rooms, with the sound bleeding out of the store and into the mall. What if specific songs influence—or attract—shoppers focused on specific types of clothing? Which tunes pull in tire-kickers and which are good buyer lures? Critically, though, this is all based on the psychology of how teens interact with apparel. It has very little to do with actual tailoring.Read more...

Amazon insists that it doesn’t do differential pricing, but on October 18 a high-profile tech blogger went ballistic because the E-tail giant apparently did just that. Tim Bray, who also happens to be a Google engineer, fumed that amazon.com had a $9.48 price on an e-book he wanted, but when he logged in to buy it, the price immediately jumped by more than $5—to $15.17. “Maybe there’s an explanation,” Bray wrote. “I don’t care what it is, it’s not good enough and it’s not reasonable

and I’m not paying that price and maybe you shouldn’t be either.” Whew!

The likely problem: Bray, a Canadian, was visiting Amazon’s U.S. site, where Amazon sets its own e-book prices under terms of a price-fixing settlement. Once Bray logged in, Amazon spotted him as Canadian and gave him Amazon Canada’s price, which is set by the publisher. (The fact that publishers also run their own sale prices may be why e-book prices also seemed to drop for Bray as soon as he bought books.) But it’s still aggravating to customers. And that cross-border quirk means Amazon does differential pricing after all—no matter how much it tries not to.…

How about the fact that those mobile stores will also be pushing customers to buy a new phone as long as they're already in the store? And yes, we're sure that will make retail chains feel warm and fuzzy about Isis, too.Read more...

In each case, PIN pads were physically compromised, one per store, in dozens of stores clustered in specific geographic areas. The PIN pads were apparently tampered with during the spring and summer months, and tampering was limited to the countertop devices. How likely is all this to be coincidental? Not very.Read more...

But the six-month French trial that has just started is taking the efficiency goal one step further, by marrying a contactless smartcard—which holds the biometric data—with the POS-affixed biometric scanner. The retailers estimate that the contactless card's transmission will be intercepted by the POS authentication element from two meters away, which is about 79 inches or about 6.6 feet.Read more...

Shoppers who tried finding the details on target.com were locked into an endless loop. Clicking on the link provided on the chain's news page took shoppers (and us) to a "More reasons to love Target" page, which had a link taking us to an "Our low price promise" page, which looped back to the "More reasons" page. As of Wednesday (Oct. 24), Target had finally inserted an updated price-match page, complete with details, into that loop. The details, though, paint a very different picture than Target's announcement did. For example, the program has a "limit quantity of 1 online price match, per identical item, per guest." So if a shopper has two children and wants to get them the identical toy, and if that toy is being offered at Amazon for less, Target will only grant the lower price on one of them? Read more...

Most relationships between retailers and shoppers are dictated by some form of contract, typically online, pens Legal Columnist Mark Rasch. This may be true even for purchases made in brick-and-mortar stores, as courts increasingly look to the online contract to determine the rights and responsibilities of parties even if the consumer never went online. But online contracts present a problem for merchants: How do you change them?Read more...

As more chains struggle with fully embracing merged-channel operations, we have a delicious contradiction. The benefits of such a merged-channel approach are definite and intense. However, the risk of damage being inflicted by a less than precise execution is equally certain. Hence, it’s a path that needs to be traveled—but oh so carefully.

StorefrontBacktalk and ChainLink Research have collaborated on a report that looks at some of the less-covered pitfalls and opportunities of this approach. Take a peek.…

On October 19, as expected, the settlement was formally submitted to U.S. District Court Judge John Gleeson. But many of the retailers behind the settlement have now changed their mind and are actively opposing it. Those reversals, though, won't necessarily have a direct impact on the settlement's status, because Gleeson now has to decide for himself whether the settlement advances the interests of consumers, retailers and the industry.Read more...