Evan Schuman's StorefrontBacktalk

For many retail IT execs, it's more than a little uncomfortable. Store managers are on the same side as IT. Setting up systems to see who's underperforming—and exactly how, in near-real-time—can feel, well, a little dirty. Maybe that's why so few chains are doing it—and why most of the systems offered by vendors for using RFID data aren't built for that type of visibility. "Our number-one fight with software vendors is, your software doesn't do enough," said American Apparel VP of Technology Stacey Shulman. "'Well, it's what everybody else uses.' Well, it's not enough."Read more...

Whether such a possibility is good or evil depends on whether you are salivating over seeing your rivals' transactions or envisioning your rivals seeing all of your transactions. Officially, none of the mobile wallet players—including Google, PayPal and ISIS—has threatened to sell peeks at your transaction receipts to your rivals, although no one is willing to rule out future revenue sources. But the smaller vendors that are offering your customers free digitization of their paper receipts—and usually an offer to also store any already-digitized receipts—are the more likely sources of this cross-merchant data.Read more...

Google is finally beginning to tighten the screws on users of its Google Maps. Well, sort of. On October 26, the search giant said that, starting Jan. 1, 2012, it will begin charging $4 per 1,000 views through its Maps API—but only for Web sites that exceed 25,000 map-views in a single day. Because Google is only counting the initial map access in that 25,000, it should be pretty easy for retailers to calculate whether this change will cost them anything at all.

For many retailers using Google Maps just on “find a store” pages, that pricing pretty much wipes out any incentive to jump ship to Microsoft’s or Yahoo’s map offerings—changing and testing the code would probably cost more than paying the overage fee on a few busy days. (If you’re a heavier user, because you have Google Maps in logistics or other geotracking applications, you may want to consider your options.) The actual pain may be trivial this time around, but it’s still a reminder that free Internet services probably won’t stay free forever—even from Google, which really wants retailers to be its new best friends.…

Conventional wisdom is that consumer resistance to invasive marketing consistently softens over time with each new retail tech innovation. But the friendly shopkeeper demonstrates that's not a linear trend. And there's a school of thought that says mobile technology may break that trend, too. The potential invasiveness of mobile payments is so intense that customers might rebel and resist all privacy-infringing efforts even more—making mobile dangerously likely to blow up in retailers' faces.Read more...

Several states have laws that restrict either in whole or in part the use of certain personal information as a condition of accepting a credit card, pens Legal Columnist Mark Rasch. The trick, though, is whether to write it down or not. (Hint: You really don't want to write it down.)Read more...

"At the scan, we get a certain amount of metadata as a result of the scan itself—operating system, carrier, cell tower being used, etc. We get all of that," said Scanbuy CEO Mike Wehrs. "We know what that app has scanned in the past." Indeed, Wehrs argues, the app can secure data from the QR code plus the phone plus online data accessed from a retailer's loyalty card database. "If the app integrates with their CRM files, it can give a completely customized experience."Read more...

The potential of this microlocation mobile approach is compelling, because it provides a relatively easy—and somewhat accurate—way to help customers find product. Of course, that's not the goal of all chains. Some chains—such as Costco—depend heavily on the customer stumbling on impulse buys as he/she wanders the aisles in search of the elusive clothes pins or peanuts.Read more...

Here’s an IT twist: The $9 billion Whole Foods Market grocery chain is pulling back from accepting checks primarily because it wants to collect less customer data. Making this move even more unusual is that checks—along with cash—have a much higher margin than payment cards due to a delicious absence of interchange.

“We simply don’t want the burden of having all that information,” said Whole Foods spokesperson Libba Letton, adding that it’s the same reason the chain has thus far shunned any type of CRM/loyalty program. That said, there are other more mundane reasons for the 300-store 38-state chain’s rejection of checks, added Letton: “It takes too long, and the financial impact of check fraud.” Also, there’s the fact that the number of consumers using checks at grocery stores is plummeting, so why keep associates trained on something that is so rarely used? Still, the idea of a chain choosing to prematurely halt an interchange-free system that brings in lots of customer data, that’s an unusual kettle of organic steamed fish.…

That crucial point, buried in Yegge's 4,800-word rant: Google (just like most retail chains) has built a company on top of a collection of applications. Amazon (where Yegge worked for six years) has built its enormous E-Commerce success because it is not just a bundle of retail applications. It's a platform that lets customers interact, outside retailers sell and other third parties connect. But Amazon didn't start that way. And how it made the transition should have retail chains thinking hard about whether that's the right approach for them, too.Read more...

Is it illegal, or even against the various card brand rules or PCI's rules, to use information from the confirmation process to access public information and to then use it? Amazon is not accused of publishing the verification data directly (which would have raised very different issues) but of using that data to track down public records. And if Amazon indeed did that—and that's still a big "if"—is that a legitimate area for retailers to use to grow CRM databases?Read more...

The vendor behind the trial, a U.K. firm called Path Intelligence, pledged that "no mobile phone usernames or numbers could be accessed" and that "all we do is log the movement of a phone around an area and aggregate this to provide trend data for businesses." But what if that phone-tracking data is linked with security cameras and/or POS systems? What if a mall representative called one of its retail residents and said, "We're now tracking a woman who has spent $980 in the last hour and she has just walked into your store. For a $300 fee, I'll tell you exactly where she's standing right now. Deal?"Read more...

When customers bring clothes to a dressing room—or even when those apparel items are purchased—there would seem to be a strong chance that the wrong hangers could get associated with the wrong piece of clothing. Attentive associates could painstakingly note the numbers of each identical hanger to make sure one item doesn't get confused with another, but that would seem to demand a sharp labor increase.Read more...

For example: Where should the QR codes be placed? Should it be near the bottom of the screen? Well, what if the consumer time-shifts with a DVR or Tivo? A part of the code could be overridden by screen buttons. Place it in a glossy magazine? Good choice, but you have to steer clear of the page side toward any glued (perfect-bound) gutter or else consumers won't be able to get a full scan of the image.Read more...

Beyond the obvious—strengthening the local friendly face of the neighborhood store—this could alert corporate to stores that are resonating with their audiences and those that are not. It's not unusual for chains to allow specific stores to have very different product mixes based on the manager's read on local customers. In turn, this could enable those differences to be much more pronounced than is practical today with a single walmart.com site. This all presumes, though, that customer interactions with local Facebook sites—especially as measured by the number of "likes" a site gets—is a meaningful metric. That's far from being a given.Read more...

The new service, called Refill Reminder Text Alerts, is based on a top-notch idea. The goal is to aid customers who have multiple refills and have had the onus of initiating contact with their pharmacy every time a prescription needs to be refilled, even if they have been consistently refilling the same prescriptions every month for years. Instead of waiting for the customer to call, the chain is initiating that contact and asking with a simple text for permission to refill the order. The problem involves restrictions from the U.S. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). It prevents the texts from identifying which prescription it's asking about.Read more...

But the limited four-day experiment also demonstrated the many QR drawbacks that retailers have to struggle with. A reporter for Forbes, for example, tried making a purchase during the event through a QR code and found that her couch was 10 feet away from the screen but that she had to get up to scan the code from five feet away. People who successfully navigated the QR code got to an ordinary Web site page. No discount, no special reward. And how long would the code be displayed? Then there's the learning curve.Read more...

It then offered a clue. For a store in Ft. Worth, Texas, for example, the tease said: "It may be a Full House but we are convinced you will go bananas for this bag. Find it and win the bag." The promotion couldn't really indicate how close the customer was to the gift, because Foursquare's GPS signal typically ends the instant the customer enters the building. Neiman Marcus couldn't go any farther, "because of our infrastructure. We'd need to have sensors all over the store," said Jean Scheidnes, the chain's manager of social media. But what if a chain did deploy such a network of in-store sensors? The potential could go way beyond fun and games.Read more...

The tale of 19-year-old Sears associate Zachariah S. Grigsby, though, gets even more strange. It all started on August 12 when Grigsby, who worked at the Sears at Heath's Indian Mound Mall, was processing a customer who used his Discover card, said Heath Det. Sgt. Craig Black. Read more...

That's the upshot of the deal cut in bankruptcy court after the Federal Trade Commission and a special court-appointed Consumer Privacy Ombudsman pushed for an opt-in requirement for Borders loyalty customers, while B&N wanted to offer them nothing more than its own privacy policy. Ironically, either of those two choices would have made life relatively easy for B&N's IT shop. Instead, the privacy compromise could require furious IT activity in the weeks after the sale closes on Friday (Sept. 30).Read more...

But in light of this bill's lengthy exemptions and data breach size limits—public disclosure, for example, is only required when a breach impacts more than 5,000 people in one state—the National Retail Federation issued a statement saying it fears that with so many retailers having to report data breaches under this legislation people might get bored and start to ignore the notices. NRF dubs this scenario "notice fatigue." What does it say to the nation when the chief lobbying organization charged with protecting retail interests publicly trumpets the fact that it believes there will be a huge number of data breach reports if full disclosure is required? Yeah, that makes me want to go and buy stock in Wal-Mart and Walgreens right away.Read more...

The Federal Trade Commission is reworking its rules on how E-Commerce sites have to deal with children (12 years old and younger) who visit. Yes, “uh-oh” is the correct response. The FTC is officially soliciting feedback on its proposed changes to the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule. It might be a good idea to take a peek at its changes and offer some feedback.

Do they need help? One of the FTC’s questions was whether certain emerging technologies are “Web sites located on the Internet” or “online services.” Web sites located on the Internet? As opposed to what? One begins to wonder if the FTC understands that the Worldwide Web and E-mail and FTP and newsgroups and IP services are all part of the Internet. No matter. The issues being debated include parental consent methods, along with how it’s determined who is a child and who isn’t, given that some children might simply opt to lie. From an E-tail perspective, there are huge implications about verification, handling this data and delays before legitimate information can be gathered. The rules themselves look fairly benign, but the FTC needs to hear more comments from E-tail IT folk about the implications of various methods of authentication and collection. Better to help form the rules now then to complain about them later. (Note: As an IT person, you do have an obligation to do both.) …

The simplest way for a site to guess whether another site is influencing purchases is to review referral link logs, to see where customers were right before. That method, however, doesn't make much sense with many social sites. A Twitter visitor, for example, will likely click on a link to read the reviews/photos/thoughts of a Twitter connection, and only after that—and perhaps one or two more links—will the customer visit the retailer's site.Read more...

The problem isn't just that PayPal has apparently done nothing to pull together its pile of recently acquired technologies into a suite of payment services. It's that each of these services has real problems that have dogged retailers' efforts at mobile payments for years. And astonishingly, PayPal doesn't seem to have solved any of them.Read more...

Company officials say they expect the system to be—please forgive us—measurably more accurate than any E-Commerce apparel tactic being used elsewhere today. The process starts with a database of between 80 and 90 questions and asks between 20 and 22 questions of each shopper, with each answer dictating the next question. If all goes well, the entire process should be completed within three minutes and it's often closer to 1.8 minutes.Read more...

The idea is straight-forward enough. If a ToysRUs customer can't easily get to the local store, he/she asks a friend/relative to pick up the item as a favor. The initial customer simply is asked to give the picker-upper's first/last name, E-mail, phone number, address and the relation to purchaser. The picker-upper gets a direct E-mail message indicating the item is ready for pickup. Before going any further, ToysRUs is now picking up a bunch of verified E-mail addresses of people who are near its stores, along with other bits of wonderful data. Not only is the E-mail address verified (they had to receive the confirmation notice), but so is the name and address, courtesy of the driver's license or other ID they had to show when picking up the merchandise.Read more...